Re: lgpl clock-time module

2011-05-21 Thread Paul Eggert
On 05/21/11 02:02, Andy Wingo wrote: > On Wed 04 May 2011 18:36, Paul Eggert writes: > >> On 05/04/11 09:34, Andy Wingo wrote: >>> Would you all be OK with making "clock-time" to be LGPL? >> >> Yes, that one's trivial: it actually contains only BSD-like license code >> so it could be marked BSD-l

Re: lgpl clock-time module

2011-05-21 Thread Andy Wingo
On Wed 04 May 2011 18:36, Paul Eggert writes: > On 05/04/11 09:34, Andy Wingo wrote: >> Would you all be OK with making "clock-time" to be LGPL? > > Yes, that one's trivial: it actually contains only BSD-like license code > so it could be marked BSD-like if gnulib had a mark for that. Ping :) A

Re: lgpl clock-time module

2011-05-04 Thread Paul Eggert
On 05/04/11 09:34, Andy Wingo wrote: > Would you all be OK with making "clock-time" to be LGPL? Yes, that one's trivial: it actually contains only BSD-like license code so it could be marked BSD-like if gnulib had a mark for that.

lgpl clock-time module

2011-05-04 Thread Andy Wingo
Hello, Would you all be OK with making "clock-time" to be LGPL? It doesn't actually include any GPL code, and depends only on "extensions", which is LGPL. Thanks, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/