On 05/04/11 09:34, Andy Wingo wrote: > Would you all be OK with making "clock-time" to be LGPL?
Yes, that one's trivial: it actually contains only BSD-like license code so it could be marked BSD-like if gnulib had a mark for that.
On 05/04/11 09:34, Andy Wingo wrote: > Would you all be OK with making "clock-time" to be LGPL?
Yes, that one's trivial: it actually contains only BSD-like license code so it could be marked BSD-like if gnulib had a mark for that.