Thank you, Paul. My local tests also show that it behaves better now.
Am Mi., 5. Jan. 2022 um 20:54 Uhr schrieb Paul Eggert :
>
> On 1/5/22 10:00, Bruno Haible wrote:
> > Another possible fix would be to change
> >size_t size;
> > to
> >idx_t size;
> > in the struct.
>
> Yes, that fits bet
On 1/5/22 10:00, Bruno Haible wrote:
Another possible fix would be to change
size_t size;
to
idx_t size;
in the struct.
Yes, that fits better into our strategy of preferring signed to unsigned
types for sizes. Plus, it avoids a cast that's too powerful in C. I
installed the attached.Fro
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen:
> If "stack.h" is included by client code that is supposed to be
> compiled with "-Wsign-compare", the compiler will complain about the
> comparison on line 121.
Indeed: although we don't care about -Wsign-compare warnings in Gnulib
code, consumers of .h files from Gnulib m
Commit 3dc36216f168f4e752b648b19d85eab32a037827 by Paul Eggert
introduced a regression in the stack module.
If "stack.h" is included by client code that is supposed to be
compiled with "-Wsign-compare", the compiler will complain about the
comparison on line 121.
There wasn't a problem before com
