Thank you, Paul. My local tests also show that it behaves better now.

Am Mi., 5. Jan. 2022 um 20:54 Uhr schrieb Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu>:
>
> On 1/5/22 10:00, Bruno Haible wrote:
> > Another possible fix would be to change
> >    size_t size;
> > to
> >    idx_t size;
> > in the struct.
>
> Yes, that fits better into our strategy of preferring signed to unsigned
> types for sizes. Plus, it avoids a cast that's too powerful in C. I
> installed the attached.

Reply via email to