Re: Renaming module stdio to stdio-h, etc.

On 2024-12-27 I did: > This series of patches simplifies the picture by using the name > FOO-h for modules that provide only the header file. Somehow I missed the 'ctype' module. It needs to be renamed to 'ctype-h', because the 'isblank' module is separate from it. 2025-02-13 Bruno Haible

Re: Renaming module stdio to stdio-h, etc.

Thanks for doing that, and for doing all the other naming cleanup.

Re: Renaming module stdio to stdio-h, etc.

Paul Eggert wrote: > > Maybe to just 'bool' instead of 'stdbool-h' ? > > That'd be fine. Done: 2024-12-28 Bruno Haible Rename module stdbool-h to bool. Reported by Paul Eggert in . * modules/

Re: Renaming module stdio to stdio-h, etc.

On 12/27/24 17:07, Bruno Haible wrote: Maybe to just 'bool' instead of 'stdbool-h' ? That'd be fine.

Re: Renaming module stdio to stdio-h, etc.

Paul Eggert wrote: > > This series of patches simplifies the picture by using the name > > FOO-h for modules that provide only the header file. > > stdbool hasn't provided a header file ever since the C23-related changes > a couple of years ago, so why change its name to stdbool-h? stdbool-h is

Re: Renaming module stdio to stdio-h, etc.

On 12/27/24 14:48, Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list wrote: This series of patches simplifies the picture by using the name FOO-h for modules that provide only the header file. stdbool hasn't provided a header file ever since the C23-related changes a couple of years ago, so why change i

Renaming module stdio to stdio-h, etc.

The naming of header file modules is currently not consistent. We have modules like - stdio, wchar - which provide only the header file, - fcntl-h, wctype-h - which also provide only the header file, - execinfo - which provide the header file and all its functions. A user thus always has to