Paul Eggert wrote: > > This series of patches simplifies the picture by using the name > > FOO-h for modules that provide only the header file. > > stdbool hasn't provided a header file ever since the C23-related changes > a couple of years ago, so why change its name to stdbool-h? stdbool-h is > now a more-confusing name than stdbool.
'stdbool' is the classical name of the header file. Since, as you say, in C23 the header file is not necessary to #include any more, we could rename the module. Maybe to just 'bool' instead of 'stdbool-h' ? Bruno
