Hi Bruno,
On 3/16/24 4:46 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Here the Python output is prettier. So, here is a patch to align
> gnulib-tool.sh's output with gnulib-tool.py. It's a leftover from this patch,
> which did not cover the --local-dir options:
I realized that I accidental made the Python output p
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> OATH Toolkit fails with sh+py though... gnulib-cache.m4.
The only remaining difference in gnulib-cache.m4 now is:
$ diff -u oath-toolkit-sh/liboath/gl/m4/gnulib-cache.m4
oath-toolkit-py/liboath/gl/m4/gnulib-cache.m4
--- oath-toolkit-sh/liboath/gl/m4/gnulib-cache.m4 2024
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Also it seems to "forget" gl_LGPL([2]) in gnulib-cache.m4.
This patch fixes it. It was an omission in my commit on 2022-08-03
"gnulib-tool.py: Follow gnulib-tool changes, part 23."
2024-03-16 Bruno Haible
gnulib-tool.py: Don't lose the gl_LGPL value from gnul
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> OATH Toolkit fails with sh+py though... isn't the --local-dir part
> working? It doesn't notice the patches in liboath/gl/override.
Indeed. It reads the gl_LOCAL_DIR value from gnulib-cache.m4 but
then overwrites it with []. This patch fixes it.
2024-03-15 Bruno Haibl
Yesterday I did:
> * gnulib-tool: New file, based on gnulib-tool.sh.
Here's a small improvement.
2024-03-15 Bruno Haible
gnulib-tool: Enhance last patch.
* gnulib-tool: If gnulib-tool.sh failed but gnulib-tool.py succeeded,
report that and don't erase the outpu
Hi Simon,
On 3/15/24 7:30 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Wow it is very much faster! \o/
That result is interesting. I wonder what part takes the shell script
so long. Maybe I'll use gnulib-tool as an excuse to expirement with
perf, dtrace, etc.
> OATH Toolkit fails with sh+py though...
Yes, Bru
Collin Funk writes:
>> But in the current state, it fails for nearly every command. There's
>> no hope that you can expect identical results from the two implementations
>> as long as there are still items in the TODO list.
>
> Yes. I am working on it. I've added the following lines to my
> ~/.pr
Hi Bruno,
On 3/14/24 2:22 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> OK. If you start to go into this direction, it is time for me to
> implement the GNULIB_TOOL_IMPL=sh+py option. Done through the patch below.
Oops, I didn't mean to rush you... I was just changing a few lines of
the boostrap script by hand. This
