On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 7:05 PM Paul Eggert wrote:
>
> On 1/19/23 15:41, Bruno Haible wrote:
> > Jim or Paul, what should we state
> > — either in the 'fts' module description, or in the .texi documentation?
>
> The quick thing is to say in both that the description/documentation is
> incomplete,
On 1/19/23 15:41, Bruno Haible wrote:
Jim or Paul, what should we state
— either in the 'fts' module description, or in the .texi documentation?
The quick thing is to say in both that the description/documentation is
incomplete, and that people need to read the source code.
Jim may be able t
> The gnulib fts is different from glibc API, and they can return
> different results when called the same way. See end of earlier thread
> here:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2021-07/msg00070.html
Thanks for the heads-up, Simon.
> I'm not sure what could be done. Perhaps a
Bruno Haible writes:
> The 'fts' module was not documented in the documentation, so far.
The gnulib fts is different from glibc API, and they can return
different results when called the same way. See end of earlier thread
here:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2021-07/msg00070.ht
