> The gnulib fts is different from glibc API, and they can return > different results when called the same way. See end of earlier thread > here: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2021-07/msg00070.html
Thanks for the heads-up, Simon. > I'm not sure what could be done. Perhaps adding a sentence to the > gnulib documentation stating that the gnulib fts is not a drop-in > replacement for missing fts functionality but a separate implementation > with different behaviour. I'm not sure about what to write either. Jim or Paul, what should we state — either in the 'fts' module description, or in the .texi documentation? Bruno
