Re: collision of static_assert macros

2025-01-15 Thread Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list
Pádraig Brady wrote: > BTW I see a similar report at https://github.com/coreutils/gnulib/pull/16 > where wget-1.25.0 is failing to compile similarly on > (Centos7.9/Amd64/glibc-2.17/gcc-14.1) > Note this is also gcc 14, but the conflict is with the internal > _Static_assert() macro. If it were a

Re: collision of static_assert macros

2025-01-14 Thread Paul Eggert
On 2025-01-14 14:12, Pádraig Brady wrote: Strange indeed. For completeness, I just repro'd again with: wget https://www.pixelbeat.org/cu/coreutils-ss.tar.xz Oh, I used my own snapshot (using the coreutils commit I mentioned earlier), and used Ubuntu's Autoconf 2.72-3 to generate my 'configur

Re: collision of static_assert macros

2025-01-14 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 14/01/2025 21:42, Paul Eggert wrote: On 2025-01-14 11:46, Pádraig Brady wrote: Testing https://www.pixelbeat.org/co/coreutils-ss.tar.xz on solaris 11 (cfarm216.cfarm.net) I get a build failure (with gcc 14) due to an already known issue on solaris where it defines a two param static_assert()

Re: collision of static_assert macros

2025-01-14 Thread Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list
Hi Pádraig, > Testing https://www.pixelbeat.org/co/coreutils-ss.tar.xz on solaris 11 > (cfarm216.cfarm.net) > I get a build failure (with gcc 14) due to an already known issue on solaris > where it > defines a two param static_assert() macro. > >CC lib/libcoreutils_a-xfts.o > ./lib/di

Re: collision of static_assert macros

2025-01-14 Thread Paul Eggert
On 2025-01-14 11:46, Pádraig Brady wrote: Testing https://www.pixelbeat.org/co/coreutils-ss.tar.xz on solaris 11 (cfarm216.cfarm.net) I get a build failure (with gcc 14) due to an already known issue on solaris where it defines a two param static_assert() macro.   CC   lib/libcoreutils_a-