Re: autobuild.m4 time zone fix

2008-08-21 Thread Simon Josefsson
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> - date=`date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S` >> + date=`TZ=UTC date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S` > > Although this change will work on many hosts, it is not portable in > general. It should say TZ=UTC0 to conform to POSIX. Thanks, I

Re: autobuild.m4 time zone fix

2008-08-20 Thread Paul Eggert
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > - date=`date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S` > + date=`TZ=UTC date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S` Although this change will work on many hosts, it is not portable in general. It should say TZ=UTC0 to conform to POSIX.

Re: autobuild.m4 time zone fix

2008-08-18 Thread Simon Josefsson
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Pushed. This one too. /Simon >From e8ce1f16994aebc497cb91159149ec33baeadfe8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:47:23 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Use ISO 8601 format. Attribution. --- ChangeLog

Re: autobuild.m4

2007-04-16 Thread Simon Josefsson
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Simon, > >> Any objections to this patch? > > Only minor ones: > > - About the naming of the naming of the module. It's confusing to see > indications that "autobuild" is > - A package downloadable from your site that makes it easy to collect >

Re: autobuild.m4

2007-04-12 Thread Paul Eggert
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > if test "$?" != 0 > I thought $? always expands to a non-empty sequence of digits. Are > you expecting a negative integer as value of "$?" ? Even if $? were negative, usages like "test -1 != 0" would work on any host conforming to POSIX, as wel

Re: autobuild.m4

2007-04-12 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Simon, > Any objections to this patch? Only minor ones: - About the naming of the naming of the module. It's confusing to see indications that "autobuild" is - A package downloadable from your site that makes it easy to collect the results of automatic builds, - A web site (au

Re: autobuild.m4

2007-04-12 Thread Simon Josefsson
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > According to Simon Josefsson on 4/12/2007 6:51 AM: >> >> I just realized a namespace problem, when I wanted to apply the >> following obvious patch: >> >> +configure.ac-early: >> +AC_REQUIRE([AB_INIT]) >> + > > Currently, the instructions at > http://jose

Re: autobuild.m4

2007-04-12 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Simon Josefsson on 4/12/2007 6:51 AM: > > I just realized a namespace problem, when I wanted to apply the > following obvious patch: > > +configure.ac-early: > +AC_REQUIRE([AB_INIT]) > + Currently, the instructions at http://josefsson.o

Re: autobuild.m4

2007-04-12 Thread Simon Josefsson
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Also, is the master of this file still autobuild (in which case Karl >> would want to set up an auto-syncer), or do you intend for autobuild >> to now pull the latest rev from gnulib? > > It seems simpler to have the master be gnulib. I'm pulling > a

Re: autobuild.m4

2007-04-12 Thread Simon Josefsson
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > According to Simon Josefsson on 4/12/2007 5:20 AM: >> Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> According to Simon Josefsson on 4/12/2007 2:31 AM: Several projects uses autobuild.m4 (at least gnutls, gsasl, inetutils, libidn) and also use gnu

Re: autobuild.m4

2007-04-12 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Simon Josefsson on 4/12/2007 5:20 AM: > Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> According to Simon Josefsson on 4/12/2007 2:31 AM: >>> Several projects uses autobuild.m4 (at least gnutls, gsasl, inetutils, >>> libidn) and also use gnu

Re: autobuild.m4

2007-04-12 Thread Simon Josefsson
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > According to Simon Josefsson on 4/12/2007 2:31 AM: >> Several projects uses autobuild.m4 (at least gnutls, gsasl, inetutils, >> libidn) and also use gnulib. It seems easier to distribute >> autobuild.m4 via gnulib. Any objections to this patch? > > Sounds

Re: autobuild.m4

2007-04-12 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Simon Josefsson on 4/12/2007 2:31 AM: > Several projects uses autobuild.m4 (at least gnutls, gsasl, inetutils, > libidn) and also use gnulib. It seems easier to distribute > autobuild.m4 via gnulib. Any objections to this patch? Sounds