Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Also, is the master of this file still autobuild (in which case Karl >> would want to set up an auto-syncer), or do you intend for autobuild >> to now pull the latest rev from gnulib? > > It seems simpler to have the master be gnulib. I'm pulling > autobuild.m4 from gnulib in autobuild now.
I just realized a namespace problem, when I wanted to apply the following obvious patch: --- autobuild 12 Apr 2007 10:28:33 +0200 1.1 +++ autobuild 12 Apr 2007 14:50:49 +0200 @@ -6,6 +6,9 @@ Depends-on: +configure.ac-early: +AC_REQUIRE([AB_INIT]) + configure.ac: Makefile.am: Would the non-gl_ namespace be OK if we make the 'autobuild' project the master repository? If so, it feels a bit silly to have Karl have to pull in things from this project just to avoid a namespace problem. I suggest we simply permit this non-gl_ namespace and consider the 'autobuild' project the canonical upstream for autobuild.m4 (even if it is technically not true). Opinions? /Simon
