Bruno Haible writes:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Thanks for insisting.
>
>> How about this patch?
>
> It goes into this direction, yes. Additionally, it looks like most callers
> of the 'alignof' macro want the "field in struct" semantics (or at least,
> can live with this semantics). So I'm using this seman
Hi Simon,
Thanks for insisting.
> How about this patch?
It goes into this direction, yes. Additionally, it looks like most callers
of the 'alignof' macro want the "field in struct" semantics (or at least,
can live with this semantics). So I'm using this semantics for 'alignof'.
I'll push this:
Simon Josefsson writes:
> Bruno Haible writes:
>
>> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>>> The alignof module seems to have problems:
>>>
>>> j...@mocca:~/src/gnulib master$ gnulib-tool --test --with-tests alignof
>>> ...
>>> ../../gltests/test-alignof.c:41: error: negative width in bit-field
>>> ‘verify_
Bruno Haible writes:
> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> The alignof module seems to have problems:
>>
>> j...@mocca:~/src/gnulib master$ gnulib-tool --test --with-tests alignof
>> ...
>> ../../gltests/test-alignof.c:41: error: negative width in bit-field
>> ‘verify_error_if_negative_size__’
>
> I repr
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> The alignof module seems to have problems:
>
> j...@mocca:~/src/gnulib master$ gnulib-tool --test --with-tests alignof
> ...
> ../../gltests/test-alignof.c:41: error: negative width in bit-field
> ‘verify_error_if_negative_size__’
I reproduce with all versions of gcc sin
