Bruno Haible <br...@clisp.org> writes: > Hi Simon, > > Thanks for insisting. > >> How about this patch? > > It goes into this direction, yes. Additionally, it looks like most callers > of the 'alignof' macro want the "field in struct" semantics (or at least, > can live with this semantics). So I'm using this semantics for 'alignof'.
Fine with me. > I'll push this: Please do. /Simon
