"A GNU package should not refer the user to any
non-free documentation for free software."
As far as this issue goes ...
The coding standards themselves mention "Standard C". The C Standard is
not free documentation. Admittedly there is no direct link or citation,
but I don't see why
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Besides, isn't it worth a tiny sacrifice to avoid
> systematically including meaningless (and long) strings
> like onlinepubs/009695399/ in our code and documentation?
I'm reluctant to put URLs like that in the code or documentation,
since they mutate to
