On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 12:57:02AM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> If LGPLv2.5 comes to exist, it may replace some of our uses of LGPLv2+.
>
> We are moving to LGPLv3+ only those parts of gnulib where we consider
> that GPLv2 compatibility is not desired; in these cases LGPLv2.5 has no
Hi Karl,
> 2) Assuming that is not imminent, we are contemplating changing the
>licensing for most gnulib files to GPLv3+/LGPLv3+. Any reactions?
This is unrelated to LGPLv2.5. (I shouldn't have mentioned the two independent
topics in a single mail; my bad.)
If LGPLv2.5 comes t
Hi Brett,
1) Are there still plans for LGPL v2.5, or is that effectively dead?
2) Assuming that is not imminent, we are contemplating changing the
licensing for most gnulib files to GPLv3+/LGPLv3+. Any reactions?
Thanks,
Karl
