Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: findutils doesn't compile on sunos 4.1.4

2005-06-06 Thread Derek Price
Paul Eggert wrote: >I wouldn't object to minor and obvious tweaks that are checked out by >a real user who actually needs findutils to run on SunOS 4.1.4. My >assumption in dropping support for SunOS 4.1.4 was partly predicated >on nobody really needing it any more (and computer museums don't cou

Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: findutils doesn't compile on sunos 4.1.4

2005-06-05 Thread jason andrade
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Paul Eggert wrote: James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Findutils uses a substantial amount of gnulib code; I would not want the gnulib maintainers to think that I thought they should put in extra effort to maintain support for SunOS 4.1.4. I wouldn't object to mino

Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: findutils doesn't compile on sunos 4.1.4

2005-06-04 Thread Paul Eggert
James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Findutils uses a substantial amount of gnulib code; I would not want > the gnulib maintainers to think that I thought they should put in > extra effort to maintain support for SunOS 4.1.4. I wouldn't object to minor and obvious tweaks that are checked

[bug-gnulib] Re: findutils doesn't compile on sunos 4.1.4

2005-06-03 Thread James Youngman
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 10:54:07PM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote: > Derek Price asked: > > In a recent discussion on bug-gnulib of the GNULIB stat & lstat modules, > > GNULIB admins Jim Meyering, Bruno, and Paul Eggert agreed that it was no > > longer useful to support SunOS 4.1.4 in GNULIB since even

[bug-gnulib] Re: findutils doesn't compile on sunos 4.1.4

2005-06-03 Thread Bruno Haible
Derek Price asked: > In a recent discussion on bug-gnulib of the GNULIB stat & lstat modules, > GNULIB admins Jim Meyering, Bruno, and Paul Eggert agreed that it was no > longer useful to support SunOS 4.1.4 in GNULIB since even Sun stopped > supporting it over a year ago (handy dead OS reference h

Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: findutils doesn't compile on sunos 4.1.4

2005-06-03 Thread Derek Price
Bruno Haible wrote: >James Youngman wrote: > > >>Certainly I believe that should >>define NULL (though my copy of the standard isn't to hand). >> >> > >On SunOS 4, it doesn't. GNU gettext has this ChangeLog entry: > >2001-10-31 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >* plural.y: Inclu

[bug-gnulib] Re: findutils doesn't compile on sunos 4.1.4

2005-06-03 Thread Bruno Haible
James Youngman wrote: > Certainly I believe that should > define NULL (though my copy of the standard isn't to hand). On SunOS 4, it doesn't. GNU gettext has this ChangeLog entry: 2001-10-31 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * plural.y: Include , needed for NULL with SunOS 4 cc. ___

[bug-gnulib] Re: findutils doesn't compile on sunos 4.1.4

2005-06-03 Thread jason andrade
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, James Youngman wrote: Thanks for the bug report. It would be nice if it did work. i agree. but i am not holding my breath as a) i'm sure the number of sunos4 users out there is very finite b) the older version of findutils appears to work fine but thanks for taking the t

[bug-gnulib] Re: findutils doesn't compile on sunos 4.1.4

2005-06-03 Thread Ian Abbott
On 03/06/2005 09:34, James Youngman wrote: [...] Certainly I believe that should define NULL (though my copy of the standard isn't to hand). Mine isn't either (that horribly annotated book), but draft standards are online, e.g. . According to th

[bug-gnulib] Re: findutils doesn't compile on sunos 4.1.4

2005-06-03 Thread James Youngman
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 11:20:35AM +1000, jason andrade wrote: > > hi, > > just letting you know that findutils 4.2.20 doesn't seem to compile on > sunos 4.1.4. Thanks for the bug report. It would be nice if it did work. > the error is: > > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -g -O2 -c