Paul Eggert wrote:
> Even if we remove eealloc we might as well add commentary
> explaining some of its confusion, before we remove it.
Thanks for these changes. Although, as indicated in [1], I think
we should promote this module. At least until we have a rock-solid
replacement with the original
Even if we remove eealloc we might as well add commentary
explaining some of its confusion, before we remove it.
* lib/eealloc.h: Update comment.
* modules/eealloc (Description):
Update, since eealloc is not glibc compatible.
---
ChangeLog | 9 +
lib/eealloc.h | 28 +++
