Paul Eggert wrote: > Even if we remove eealloc we might as well add commentary > explaining some of its confusion, before we remove it.
Thanks for these changes. Although, as indicated in [1], I think we should promote this module. At least until we have a rock-solid replacement with the original function names 'malloc' and 'realloc'. (See the other mail thread.) Bruno [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2024-10/msg00190.html
