Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
>> @@ -49,5 +49,5 @@ main (void)
>>x.ss_family = 42;
>>i = 42;
>>
>> - return 0;
>> + return ! (i + x.ss_family);
>> }
>
> This makes is hard to understand that the return value is really 0. (It costs
> extra brain cycles to see this.) Wouldn't it be poss
Hi Jim,
> @@ -49,5 +49,5 @@ main (void)
>x.ss_family = 42;
>i = 42;
>
> - return 0;
> + return ! (i + x.ss_family);
> }
This makes is hard to understand that the return value is really 0. (It costs
extra brain cycles to see this.) Wouldn't it be possible to write this?
(void) x;
dc70813756e173cd6b7dd5a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:26:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] test-sys_socket: avoid set-but-not-used warnings from gcc
* tests/test-sys_socket.c (main): Use "i" and "x", in order to
avoid warning
