One more. Without the patch below, I'd get these: test-sys_socket.c:36:15: warning: variable 'i' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] test-sys_socket.c:35:27: warning: variable 'x' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>From ef5acf202788003cdc70813756e173cd6b7dd5a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering <meyer...@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:26:31 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] test-sys_socket: avoid set-but-not-used warnings from gcc * tests/test-sys_socket.c (main): Use "i" and "x", in order to avoid warning about set-but-not-used variables. --- ChangeLog | 4 ++++ tests/test-sys_socket.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index 456a793..726e66a 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,5 +1,9 @@ 2010-06-11 Jim Meyering <meyer...@redhat.com> + test-sys_socket: avoid set-but-not-used warnings from gcc + * tests/test-sys_socket.c (main): Use "i" and "x", in order to + avoid warning about set-but-not-used variables. + test-xvasprintf: avoid 'const' discard warnings * tests/test-xvasprintf.c (test_xvasprintf, test_xasprintf): Use "const" when assigning from literal strings. diff --git a/tests/test-sys_socket.c b/tests/test-sys_socket.c index badf308..6ea6a73 100644 --- a/tests/test-sys_socket.c +++ b/tests/test-sys_socket.c @@ -49,5 +49,5 @@ main (void) x.ss_family = 42; i = 42; - return 0; + return ! (i + x.ss_family); } -- 1.7.1.501.g23b46