Re: [PATCH] fts: correct internal computation of nlinks (optimization-related)

2009-02-17 Thread Jim Meyering
James Youngman wrote: > What's the effect of the change? Merely a performance difference? > Or is there a correctness issue? "slight clarification" The only possible influence on correctness would be if the change affected how "nlinks" was calculated, since that's the only place "is_dir" is us

Re: [PATCH] fts: correct internal computation of nlinks (optimization-related)

2009-02-17 Thread James Youngman
What's the effect of the change? Merely a performance difference? Or is there a correctness issue?

[PATCH] fts: correct internal computation of nlinks (optimization-related)

2009-02-11 Thread Jim Meyering
TCH] fts: correct internal computation of nlinks (optimization-related) * lib/fts.c (fts_build): ISSET(FTS_NOSTAT) has no bearing on whether the current entry is a directory, so don't test it. --- ChangeLog |6 ++ lib/fts.c |2 +- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)