On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:53:30 -0700
Eric Blake wrote:
> [This wouldn't be the first time
> someone has complained that a package suffers from FTBFS when coupled
> with newer glibc, because the package was released with an older
> gnulib snapshot]
Maybe it should be mentioned on savannah page or s
SCM sources builds without problems, so inetutils will be fixed with net
release (just by updating gnulib).
Thanks and sorry for disturbance!
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:29:56 -0800
Paul Eggert wrote:
> It appears that the problem is that
> HAVE_RAW_DECL_GETS is defined, but 'gets' is
> not actually being declared.
Sorry for disgusting, I just found that inetutils-1.9.1 actually has old
gnulib headers. This is actual stdio.in.h fragment fr
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:08:16 -0700
Eric Blake wrote:
> > #if HAVE_RAW_DECL_GETS
>
> HAVE_RAW_DECL_GETS should only be non-zero if gets() is declared...
>
> > 'gets' undeclared here (not in a function)"
>
> ...but this says gets is undeclared. Are you sure you don't have a
> stale config.cache
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:20:58 -0800
Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 11/18/2012 03:03 PM, Ivan Burbakov wrote:
> > what is a proper fix?
>
> Hard to say, as there's not enough info there.
I can email any info, just ask.
>
> What's the output of this command? It's one of the failing commands,
> but wit
