On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:08:16 -0700 Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > #if HAVE_RAW_DECL_GETS > > HAVE_RAW_DECL_GETS should only be non-zero if gets() is declared... > > > 'gets' undeclared here (not in a function)" > > ...but this says gets is undeclared. Are you sure you don't have a > stale config.cache lying around from pre-glibc 2.16 days, where the > cache has old information impacting your build? There is not config.cache in workdir (and I have find-ed it in whole filesystem just in case – nothing found). What else should I check? > Other than that, I'd > have to see your config.log to see why HAVE_RAW_DECL_GETS is getting > set to non-zero when it is clearly undeclared. > These logs don't include the full config.log. Done: https://gist.github.com/4107950#file_config.log I cannot find #define for HAVE_RAW_DECL_GETS in it (moreover, 'grep -R HAVE_RAW_DECL_GETS .' in workdir doesn't show anything relevant). But it does contain GNULIB_GETS='1'. config.log also shows some problem with undeclarated optreset and getopt_clip. Does this make any sense? > Also, just looking at > the captured stdout of configure, I don't see any line that states: > > checking whether gets is declared without a macro... XXX > > I would expect that line to exist, with a resounding 'no' under modern > glibc (and a 'yes' in C99), according to the code that would normally > set HAVE_RAW_DECL_GETS. Hmmm. What could it mean?
