On 09/09/11 08:55, Markus Duft wrote:
> On 09/08/11 08:09, Markus Duft wrote:
>> On 06/10/11 11:37, Bruno Haible wrote:
> [snip]
>>>
>>> You need to find out what is wrong about that type on your platform. If
>>> you're lucky, it's only s
On 09/08/11 08:09, Markus Duft wrote:
> On 06/10/11 11:37, Bruno Haible wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> You need to find out what is wrong about that type on your platform. If
>> you're lucky, it's only some library functions (like snprintf) which don't
>> support it
On 06/10/11 11:37, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Markus Duft wrote:
>> long long double is broken.
>
> You surely mean "long double"? There is no such type as "long long double"
> in C.
>
>> this bites me in the gnulib vasnprintf im
On 06/10/11 11:37, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Markus Duft wrote:
>> long long double is broken.
>
> You surely mean "long double"? There is no such type as "long long double"
> in C.
right; long long double is too long :)
>
>> this bi
Hi!
While porting glib to interix, i stumbled over a problem i didn't hit for a
while (and in fact forgot that it existed on interix): long long double is
broken. this bites me in the gnulib vasnprintf implementation, which calls
snprintf from libc which immediately crashes ... :(
i fixed this
On 05/26/11 12:35, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Markus Duft wrote:
>>> and send us the log files of these three commands, plus config.log and
>>> gltests/config.log.
>>
>> all attached, except make check, as i could not run it, as make already
>> failed :/
>
&g
On 05/26/11 10:51, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Thursday 26 May 2011 10:43:41 Markus Duft wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> Trying to find out ;) First of all, patch seems to miss strnlen.c in the
> tarball (2.6.1).
it seems a well known problem, as even gentoo linux has a patch for thi
On 05/17/11 00:40, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi Markus,
>
>> This is a small patch in reply to [1] to update the DEPENDENCIES for interix
>> accordingly.
>>
>> [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2011-05/msg00310.html
>> "gnulib should document that libsuacomp is a
>>prerequisite f
On 05/16/11 16:01, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/16/2011 01:47 AM, md...@s01en22.salomon.at wrote:
>> From: Markus Duft
>>
>> Hey!
>>
>> This is a small patch in reply to [1] to update the DEPENDENCIES for interix
>> accordingly.
>> suacomp 0.6.8 (whic
On 05/13/11 08:27, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 05/12/11 23:15, Markus Duft wrote:
>> maybe i could even implement a futimes by memorizing the timestamps and
>> re-setting them after closing the file...
>>
>> would that be better than hacking around in gnulib? libsuacomp is
On 05/12/11 18:10, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 05/12/11 01:38, Markus Duft wrote:
>> this doesn't help, and doesn't even compile, as interix also doesn't have
>> sync()
>
> OK, how about this patch to utimens.c instead?
tested, but doesn't help eithe
On 05/12/11 09:20, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 05/11/11 23:51, Markus Duft wrote:
>> the fd in fdutimensat is 4, whereas in utimens, which is then called from
>> somewhere in there,
>> it is -1, so i can't do a fsync()
>
> If I understand things correctly, there
On 05/12/11 05:41, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 05/11/11 01:49, Markus Duft wrote:
>> fsync(fd) before setting the timestamp helps, and i have a 1.26 patch
>> (attached),
>> for now limited to interix only, although i saw it on linux too.
>
> Can you describe the GNU/Linux
I've changed enough
> that I'll wait for an ACK before pushing.
> Below I've included one more patch to clean up some more
> code formatting nits in that same file.
thanks a lot :)
markus
>
> From a481c562988f66f1614206c2f82779aa7835afb8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>
On 10/21/2010 12:35 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Markus Duft wrote:
>> On 10/21/2010 11:59 AM, James Youngman wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Markus Duft wrote:
>>>> Hi!
>>>>
>>>> I just created the attached patch for findutils
On 10/21/2010 02:30 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Markus Duft wrote:
>>> I see that you have FSF copyright assignments on file
>>> for other projects, but not yet for gnulib.
>>> Can you start that process?
>>> Once that's done, we can proceed.
>>
>
On 10/29/2010 01:11 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 10/28/2010 04:59 PM, Markus Duft wrote:
>> thinking of gnulib, i can see a lot of potential problems, starting fex,
>> that gnulib
>> modules are copied into the packages, rather than gnulib beeing an installed
>>
On 10/28/2010 04:16 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
[snip]
>
> That's exactly what gnulib is - a library of source code workarounds for
> broken platform functions. Are you interested in porting your
> libsuacomp fixes into gnulib, so that more GNU programs can support
> Interix out of the box?
(i'll take
Hi!
I just created the attached patch for findutils to build. Any chance to
get this in your git repo? :) The code is as good as it can get with
interix, i think - improvement suggestions welcome!
Thanks!
Markus
diff -ru findutils-4.5.9.orig/gnulib/lib/mountlist.c findutils-4.5.9/gnulib/lib/mount
> I see that you have FSF copyright assignments on file
> for other projects, but not yet for gnulib.
> Can you start that process?
> Once that's done, we can proceed.
phew - the other assignments are quite a while ago - i can't remember
the exact process. can you help me a little? where can i get
On 10/21/2010 11:59 AM, James Youngman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Markus Duft wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I just created the attached patch for findutils to build. Any chance to
>> get this in your git repo? :) The code is as good as it can get with
>&g
Hi!
I just created the attached patch for findutils to build. Any chance to
get this in your git repo? :) The code is as good as it can get with
interix, i think - improvement suggestions welcome!
Thanks!
Markus
diff -ru findutils-4.5.9.orig/gnulib/lib/mountlist.c findutils-4.5.9/gnulib/lib/mount
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Markus Duft writes:
>
>> Hey!
>>
>> a while ago you guys implemented a select() fix for interix 3.5 (thanks
>> again ;)). now i was surprised to see the same issue come up again (it's
>> there since a while now again, just had
Hey!
a while ago you guys implemented a select() fix for interix 3.5 (thanks
again ;)). now i was surprised to see the same issue come up again (it's
there since a while now again, just had no time to dig into the problem).
i now had some time to look into it, and i discovered, that select is
onl
timeout) and supposed to be equivalent
> to
> select (n, NULL, NULL, NULL, timeout) for any n > 0. So, on POSIX
> systems,
> this transformation is correct, and on Interix, Markus Duft said that
> he
> verified that changing nfds from 0 to 1 made the problem go away.
>
> Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > Markus Duft wrote:
[snip]
>
> Thanks for looking at that, Pádraig.
> I agree.
>
> Note that there are other uses of select with 0 as first argument.
> These affect the poll ans select modules:
>
> $ git grep -l 'select
26 matches
Mail list logo
