On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 15:46 -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 07/29/2010 03:42 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
> >>
> >> For your request, the following contributors since 2007-10-07
> >> would have to agree:
> >
> > Don't forget Jim, who is cited as the
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 22:35 +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Adam Stokes wrote:
> > Is it possible to change these modules licenses to LGPLv2+?
>
> Have you considered releasing your library under LGPLv3+?
>
> For your request, the following contributors since 2007-10-07
> would have to agree:
>
>
00:00:00 2001
From: David Lutterkort
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:49:54 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Change license for langinfo and nl_langinfo to LGPLv2+
The regex module, which is LGPLv2+, depends on the modules.
---
modules/langinfo|2 +-
modules/nl_langinfo |2 +-
2 files changed
Hi,
would it be possible to relicense stpncpy (currently LGPL) as LGPLv2+ ?
I want to use it in Augeas, which is LGPLv2+.
David
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 22:08 +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Ian Beckwith wrote:
> > * Replaces incorrect FSF addresses with pointers to www.gnu.org/licenses.
> > (picked up by 'licensecheck', in the debian devscripts package).
>
> David, is the following change OK with you?
>
> Would you also acce
Just saw users.txt and thought it'd be nice to add augeas and netcf to
the list.
David
>From 1d174e8d36fc605e34ca84ac402f38e59d35e146 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Lutterkort
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:17:59 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] * users.txt: add augeas and netcf
---
users.tx
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 14:56 +0100, Tom G. Christensen wrote:
> Building the latest snapshot on sparc-sun-solaris2.6 fails:
> In file included from safe-alloc.c:27:
> safe-alloc.h:30:21: error: missing binary operator before token "("
> make[4]: *** [safe-alloc.o] Error 1
>
> It seems __GNUC_PREREQ
---
lib/safe-alloc.h |9 +
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/safe-alloc.h b/lib/safe-alloc.h
index 3fa3f2e..f07ee91 100644
--- a/lib/safe-alloc.h
+++ b/lib/safe-alloc.h
@@ -26,6 +26,15 @@
# include
+#ifndef __GNUC_PREREQ
+# if defined __GNUC__ &&
d your module, in two commits:
>
>
> 2009-02-21 David Lutterkort
>
> Tests for module 'safe-alloc'.
> * tests/test-safe-alloc.c: New file.
> * modules/safe-alloc-tests: New file.
>
> New module 'safe-alloc'.
> * lib/
Lesser General Public
+ * License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
+ * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
+ *
+ * Author: David Lutterkort
+ */
+
+#include
+
+#include
+
+#include
+
+#define ASSERT(expr) \
+ do \
+
if not impossible.
David
[1] http://libvirt.org/
>From 2b7d49a572d41ecf8da4ceb5eac35c0244315eb8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Lutterkort
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:41:11 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Macros to make the use of malloc/calloc/realloc safer
These macros address a number of shortcomings in th
On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 10:59 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> I'm committing this:
>
> 2008-12-22 Paolo Bonzini
>
> * modules/regex: Request emulations for the mb*/wc* functions we
> need.
> * m4/regex.m4: Don't look for those functions here.
> diff --git a/modules/regex b/module
These two patches change the new selinux-h module by (1) setting
LIB_SELINUX so that it can easily be linked against (based very closely on
what coreutils does) and (2) add _UNUSED_PARAMETER_ annotation to all the
functions in the stub implementations to avoid spurious compiler wanrings
David
From: Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* lib/se-selinux.in.h: Mark parameters as _UNUSED_PARAMETER_.
* lib/se-context.in.h: Likewise.
---
lib/se-context.in.h | 18 +++---
lib/se-selinux.in.h | 50 ++
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
---
m4/selinux-selinux-h.m4 |8
modules/selinux-h |3 +++
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/m4/selinux-selinux-h.m4 b/m4/selinux-selinux-h.m4
index 822ffa2..464b782 100644
--- a/m4/selinux-selinux-h.m4
+++ b/m4/selinux-selinux-h.m4
@@ -14,4 +14,
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 13:45 +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> > What do you think about relicensing canonicalize-lgpl to lgplv2+?
> > Among its dependents, a quick glance suggests only readlink would
> > need the same adjustment.
>
> No problem with doing that. We promised this to everyone
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 00:57 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> David Lutterkort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I've given your patch a quick spin, and ran into the following issues:
> >
> > * __attribute_pure__ in argz.h is not defined
> > *
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 19:12 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> I've included a still-preliminary patch below, in case you'd like to test it.
> [I say preliminary because it effectively removes the C++-accommodating
> code that's in the old version and because it's totally untested.
> Adding C++ syntax is
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 14:00 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> If I hear no objection soon, I will sync gnulib's argz.c
> directly from glibc, using something like the above.
> Then, gnulib and libtool can evolve separately, if needed.
>
> However, I'd really like to hear that at least one owner of
> an
cce8e8470 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Lutterkort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 14:35:18 -0700
Subject: Fix underflow and subsequent memory corruption
* lib/argz.c(argz_stringify): sync with glibc-2.7; previous version
would underflow the size_t len when it was 0
>From 7bce6f3f1ac91a482f6c72aa4b84239e5cadfec4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Lutterkort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 15:28:57 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Add missing argz_* functions from glibc
* argz.c (argz_add_sep, argz_create, argz_create_sep, argz_replace,
ar
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 19:43 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> * David Lutterkort wrote on Thu, May 29, 2008 at 01:06:50AM CEST:
> >
> > + for (p = *argz, ap = argv; *ap; ++ap, ++p)
> > + p = __stpcpy (p, *ap);
>
> Any reason this wasn
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 14:17 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Only after writing the above did I go look at the unmodified
> code in gnulib's argz.c, and there, I saw all of the similar,
> existing uses of assert. Now I see why you've done this.
Hi Jim,
Yes, that's the only reason I added the assert
Make the license on stpcpy explicitly LGPLv2+. Since the code comes from
glibc, this change should be ok. This makes stpcpy usable if gnulib-tool is
told to use license --lgpl=2
Signed-off-by: David Lutterkort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
modules/stpcpy |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions
, stpcpy, and strndup
Signed-off-by: David Lutterkort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
lib/argz.c| 221 +
lib/argz.in.h |7 ++
m4/argz.m4|3 +-
modules/argz |3 +
4 files changed, 233 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
These two patches add all the argz_* functions present in glibc-2.7 that
were not in gnulib yet. The functions are taken pretty much verbatim from
glibc. The only changes are addition of a few asserts and using public
interfaces where the glibc sources used __ functions.
Since the argz module now
These two patches add all the argz_* functions present in glibc-2.7 that
were not in gnulib yet. The functions are taken pretty much verbatim
from glibc. The only changes are addition of a few asserts and using
public interfaces where the glibc sources used __ functions.
Since the argz module now
Hi,
I just noticed that the argz module does not contain argz_add_sep, even
though the docs indicate it does. I'd be more than happy to work up a
patch assuming the omission isn't intentional.
David
28 matches
Mail list logo
