On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 13:45 +0200, Bruno Haible wrote: > Hi Jim, > > > What do you think about relicensing canonicalize-lgpl to lgplv2+? > > Among its dependents, a quick glance suggests only readlink would > > need the same adjustment. > > No problem with doing that. We promised this to everyone before making the > switch from v2+ to v3+ a year ago. => Done.
Excellent ! Thanks a ton. David
