http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12982
sandra at codesourcery dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at codesourcery
: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: sandra at codesourcery dot com
I'm seeing runtime failures (segfaults) when running the g++ tests
g++.dg/ipa/pr6116
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17765
sandra at codesourcery dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17444
--- Comment #2 from sandra at codesourcery dot com ---
Created attachment 8175
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8175&action=edit
tarred -save-temps output for pr61160-2.C
Yes, the problem still reproduces exa
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17444
--- Comment #5 from sandra at codesourcery dot com ---
My test results on mainline head are very "noisy" right now due to ubsan
failures, but ignoring all those, it looks like the patch is good. I'm seeing
no regressions, and t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19020
sandra at codesourcery dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20995
sandra at codesourcery dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20995
--- Comment #20 from sandra at codesourcery dot com ---
Created attachment 9856
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9856&action=edit
before/after testcase output
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20995
--- Comment #21 from sandra at codesourcery dot com ---
Nope, that's not it. I've attached a tarball with good/bad executables (from
commits 9d19e4fdb7c684329c8b1b72796a0071708dabc7 and
5474d94f03aedba2f832006dc7d680cc15792a7b, re
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20995
--- Comment #23 from sandra at codesourcery dot com ---
Created attachment 9857
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9857&action=edit
hacky patch
Hmmm. I get a working program with the attached patch. No clue wheth
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20995
--- Comment #28 from sandra at codesourcery dot com ---
The revised patch produces a failing executable identical to the bad one. I
haven't had time to dig further yet.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28849
--- Comment #10 from sandra at codesourcery dot com ---
Sorry about the delay in getting back to this. It turned out the additional
failures I was running into in linking the customer's application (once I got
past the DT_NEEDED i
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27243
sandra at codesourcery dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: sandra at codesourcery dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 13948
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13948&acti
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28849
sandra at codesourcery dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joseph at
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28849
--- Comment #4 from sandra at codesourcery dot com ---
I'm kind of confused, here; both the customer's application and Joseph's test
case linked correctly without -flto, and I used some printf debugging to track
it down to the L
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28849
--- Comment #6 from sandra at codesourcery dot com ---
That looks like the same patch I was starting to write. :-) It fixes the test
case and regression tests OK, but I probably need another day to try it out on
the customer's applic
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28849
--- Comment #7 from sandra at codesourcery dot com ---
Backporting the fix to the older branch being used by our customer is turning
out to be a hard slog. Based on Joseph's test case, the patch seems to be a
good thing on the trunk, t
18 matches
Mail list logo