https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15835
Ali Bahrami changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ali_swbugzilla at emvision dot
com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19938
Ali Bahrami changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ali_swbugzilla at emvision dot
com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19938
--- Comment #7 from Ali Bahrami ---
I understand your concerns. Our assumption is that sh_link
is always 0, or a section index, while the meaning of sh_info
is somewhat more variable, and may or may not be. This is
ancient "From New Jersey
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19938
--- Comment #8 from Ali Bahrami ---
My understand of sh_link and sh_info is the same as
what Cary outlined above, with one comment. We've seen
cases were sh_info should have been treated as a section
index, where SHF_INFO_LINK was not set. Thi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19938
--- Comment #12 from Ali Bahrami ---
I've sent an email with a more detailed reply.
I think that propagating SHF_STRINGS, if set, should be
done for all platforms, and not just for Solaris. We do
seem to be unique in setting it today, but not
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19938
--- Comment #23 from Ali Bahrami ---
> Ali, Rainer. Thomas - please could you try out this version and let me know if
> you are happy with it.
>
> One thing that this patch does not do is zero the p_paddr fields of the
> program
> headers for
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20427
Ali Bahrami changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ali_swbugzilla at emvision dot
com
