https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19938
--- Comment #23 from Ali Bahrami <ali_swbugzilla at emvision dot com> --- > Ali, Rainer. Thomas - please could you try out this version and let me know if > you are happy with it. > > One thing that this patch does not do is zero the p_paddr fields of the > program > headers for Solaris targets. I did look at doing this, but it would a lot of > hacking on very complicated, fragile code in the BFGD library. Something that > I think would be very likely to introduce new bugs. Hi Nick, Rainer and I just compared notes, and we're happy with it. These little breakages have been a chronic pain in the neck for us, and it's going to be really helpful for us once we pull in this patch. Thanks for all the work you put in to help us with this. For the record, I don't believe that Solaris ever sets p_paddr, or looks at it, so the fix for this could probably be as simple as "if (solaris) phdr->p_paddr = 0". On the other hand, it's purely cosmetic. The values you're writing there seem to correspond to something sensible (same as p_vaddr), and there's really no reason to put any extra work into it. Leave it alone. Thanks again... - Ali -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
