--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-02-20 15:53
---
Created an attachment (id=2276)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2276&action=view)
Improve memory release function in dwarf2.c
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=868
-
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-02-20 15:56
---
Hi Diogo,
You are correct, the dwarf2.c code does not clean up its memory usage very
well. The patch you suggested is a start, but it does not go far enough. For
example it does not free the varinfo and funcin
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-02-20 17:44
---
Hi John,
I have checked in the patch to implement and use bfd_realloc_or_free.
I am going to close this issue for, since the specific problem of using
bfd_realloc has now been addressed, but it can be reopene
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-02-20 17:42
---
Created an attachment (id=2278)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2278&action=view)
Implement and use bfd_realloc_or_free
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=868
--- You
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |wilson at specifixinc dot
|redhat dot com |com
Status|NEW
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |hjl dot tools at gmail dot
|redhat dot com |com
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-02-20
23:39 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-02/msg00199.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5543
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the C
