------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-02-20 17:44
-------
Hi John,
I have checked in the patch to implement and use bfd_realloc_or_free.
I am going to close this issue for, since the specific problem of using
bfd_realloc has now been addressed, but it can be reopened if more memory leaks
are discovered.
Cheers
Nick
bfd/ChangeLog
2008-02-20 Nick Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR 868
* libbfd.c (bfd_realloc_or_free): New function. Performs like
bfd_realloc, but if the (re)allocation fails, the pointer is
freed.
* libbfd-in.h: Prototype.
* libbfd.h: Regenerate.
* bfdio.c (bfd_bwrite): Use the new function.
(bfd_seek): Likewise.
* bfdwin.c:(bfd_get_file_window): Likewise.
* elf-strtab.c (_bfd_elf_strtab_add): Likewise.
* elf32-ppc.c (ppc_elf_relax_section): Likewise.
* elf32-xtensa.c (vsprintf_msg): Likewise.
* mach-o.c (bfd_mach_o_core_fetch_environment): Likewise.
* stabs.c (_bfd_link_seciton_stabs): Likewise.
* vms-misc.c (_bfd_vms_get_record): Likewise.
* vms-tir.c (check_section): Likewise.
* vms.c (vms_new_section_hook): Likewise.
* elf32-arm.c (elf32_arm_section_map_add): Check that the
allocation of sec_data->map succeeded before using it.
* elflink.c (elf_link_output_sym): Do not overwrite finfo->
symshndxbuf until it is known that the reallocation succeeded.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=868
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
