--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-09-08
11:05 ---
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2007-09/msg00030.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2007-09/msg00031.html
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-09-08
11:06 ---
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2007-09/msg00030.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2007-09/msg00031.html
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From vda dot linux at googlemail dot com
2007-09-08 13:57 ---
Tested, works for me. Thanks!
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4992
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone
I found a repeatable denial of service crash in readelf
while fuzzing with some ELF objects the other day. Here is
the GDB trace:
...
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x08069c99 in byte_get_little_endian (field=0x8d784b8 , size=4) at dwarf.c:68
68return ((unsigned
--- Additional Comments From vda dot linux at googlemail dot com
2007-09-08 14:36 ---
Thanks for incredibly fast analysis and bugfix!
I looked into how .bss_page_aligned got progbits in first place.
GCC seems to infer nobits v. progbits based on *section name*! Oh crap...
char boot_cpu
I found a repeatable denial of service crash in readelf
while fuzzing with some ELF objects the other day. Here is
the GDB trace:
...
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x08069c99 in byte_get_little_endian (field=0x8d784b8 , size=4) at dwarf.c:68
68return ((unsigned
--- Additional Comments From yaari at il dot ibm dot com 2007-09-09 06:09
---
Subject: Re: Emitting code to a NOBITS section is not handled properly
"amodra at bigpond dot net dot au" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 08/09/2007 14:06:15:
>
> --- Additional Comments From amodra at bi
