------- Additional Comments From vda dot linux at googlemail dot com
2007-09-08 14:36 -------
Thanks for incredibly fast analysis and bugfix!
I looked into how .bss_page_aligned got progbits in first place.
GCC seems to infer nobits v. progbits based on *section name*! Oh crap...
char boot_cpu_stack[IRQSTACKSIZE] __attribute__((section(".bss.page_aligned")));
gets nobits,
char boot_cpu_stack[IRQSTACKSIZE] __attribute__((section(".bss_page_aligned")));
gets progbits.
Somehow it doesn't feel like the Right Thing to do.
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com> already was pointing this out here
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00258.html
Anyway, I will be able to make it work now.
Thanks again!
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5006
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
