[Bug ld/3307] bad relocation section name `'

2006-10-06 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-10-06 12:25 --- Your SPTest.o is bad. I can't reproduce your bad SPTest.o with gcc-4.1.1-1.fc5 binutils-2.16.91.0.6-5 on FC5. Can you provide your SPTest.s? -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug ld/3307] bad relocation section name `'

2006-10-06 Thread jmbnyc at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-06 13:21 --- Subject: Re: bad relocation section name `' I'll run again and upload what you ask for. However, I upgraded binutils so I can only give you something for 2.17 (but I get the same behavior with both so it should

[Bug ld/3314] New: ELF linker aligns empty section

2006-10-06 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
When we are outputing an empty loadable section, we consider it not loadable. But we still align it at page boundary: [EMAIL PROTECTED] empty-10]$ !cat cat foo.c extern char *__init_array_start; int xxx = 10; _start () { return __init_array_start != 0; } [EMAIL PROTECTED] empty-10]$ make LD=ld

[Bug ld/3314] ELF linker aligns empty section

2006-10-06 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-10-06 13:41 --- The patch is at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-10/msg00043.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3314 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the b

[Bug ld/3307] bad relocation section name `'

2006-10-06 Thread jmbnyc at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-06 13:42 --- Created an attachment (id=1353) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1353&action=view) updated tar gzip with requested SPTest.s Here is the requested SPTest.s. I also redid everything and redid t

[Bug binutils/3315] New: ld --gc-sections *.o produces big(ger than possible) executables

2006-10-06 Thread vda dot linux at googlemail dot com
Basically, I compile an executable from same set of source files. First I compile .c modules into .o with -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections, and then I can do something a-la "gcc -o executable -Wl,--gc-sections *.o" or I can bundle almost all .o files into lib.a using ar and do "gcc -o executable

[Bug binutils/3315] ld --gc-sections *.o produces big(ger than possible) executables

2006-10-06 Thread vda dot linux at googlemail dot com
--- Additional Comments From vda dot linux at googlemail dot com 2006-10-06 15:48 --- Created an attachment (id=1354) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1354&action=view) objdump of ld *.o result -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3315 --- You

[Bug binutils/3315] ld --gc-sections *.o produces big(ger than possible) executables

2006-10-06 Thread vda dot linux at googlemail dot com
--- Additional Comments From vda dot linux at googlemail dot com 2006-10-06 15:49 --- Created an attachment (id=1355) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1355&action=view) objdump of ld main.o lib.a result -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3315 --

[Bug ld/3314] ELF linker aligns empty section

2006-10-06 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-10-06 16:20 --- The updated patch is at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-10/msg00045.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3314 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list f

[Bug ld/3307] bad relocation section name `'

2006-10-06 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-10-06 16:30 --- I created a good SPTest.o from your SPTest.s with as in binutils-2.16.91.0.6-5. I can only assume that something is wrong with your OS/hardware. Please assemble it on a different machine. -- What|Remov

[Bug ld/3307] bad relocation section name `'

2006-10-06 Thread jmbnyc at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-06 16:38 --- Subject: Re: bad relocation section name `' Can you send me the command line that you used to create SPTest.o. /JMB On 6 Oct 2006 16:30:59 -, hjl at lucon dot org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Addit

[Bug ld/3307] bad relocation section name `'

2006-10-06 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-10-06 17:05 --- I used "/usr/bin/as -o SPTest.o SPTest.s". -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3307 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone wh

[Bug ld/3307] bad relocation section name `'

2006-10-06 Thread jmbnyc at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-06 17:17 --- Subject: Re: bad relocation section name `' I just executed your command line and produced a file that is one byte different than what I sent. Not sure what is wrong with my environment as this is stock latest FC

[Bug ld/3307] bad relocation section name `'

2006-10-06 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-10-06 17:52 --- What did # gcc -v -c SPTest.s say? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3307 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug ld/3307] bad relocation section name `'

2006-10-06 Thread jmbnyc at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-06 17:57 --- Subject: Re: bad relocation section name `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] bugs]$ gcc -v -c SPTest.s Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-redhat-linux Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --info

[Bug ld/3307] bad relocation section name `'

2006-10-06 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-10-06 18:05 --- Are you saying SPTest.o generated by "gcc -c" is different from "/usr/bin/as -o"? Can you compare SPTest.o generated by # /usr/bin/as -V -Qy -o SPTest.o SPTest.s # /usr/bin/as -o SPTest.o SPTest.s # as -V -Qy -o SPTes