------- Additional Comments From jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-06 13:21 ------- Subject: Re: bad relocation section name `'
I'll run again and upload what you ask for. However, I upgraded binutils so I can only give you something for 2.17 (but I get the same behavior with both so it should not matter). /JMB On 6 Oct 2006 12:25:48 -0000, hjl at lucon dot org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-10-06 12:25 > ------- > Your SPTest.o is bad. I can't reproduce your bad SPTest.o with > > gcc-4.1.1-1.fc5 > binutils-2.16.91.0.6-5 > > on FC5. Can you provide your SPTest.s? > > > -- > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |hjl at lucon dot org > > > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3307 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. > You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. > -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3307 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
