[Bug ld/27210] ld: Don't suppress foo if foo@v1 is defined

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27210 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.llvm.org/show_

[Bug ld/27210] ld: Don't suppress foo if foo@v1 is defined

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27210 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- I opened an lld bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48820 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/27210] ld: Don't suppress foo if foo@v1 is defined

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27210 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ccoutant at gmail dot com -- You are

[Bug ld/27210] ld: Don't suppress foo if foo@v1 is defined

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27210 --- Comment #7 from Fangrui Song --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6) > (In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #5) > > The explanation is not convincing. foo and foo@v1 are two different > > symbols. > > My example does not use an undef

[Bug ld/27210] ld: Don't suppress foo if foo@v1 is defined

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27210 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #5) > The explanation is not convincing. foo and foo@v1 are two different symbols. > My example does not use an undefined symbol so I don't see how > > > shouldn't be use

[Bug ld/27210] ld: Don't suppress foo if foo@v1 is defined

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27210 --- Comment #5 from Fangrui Song --- The explanation is not convincing. foo and foo@v1 are two different symbols. My example does not use an undefined symbol so I don't see how > shouldn't be used by ld to satisfy the unversioned reference.

[Bug ld/27210] ld: Don't suppress foo if foo@v1 is defined

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27210 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/27210] ld: Don't suppress foo if foo@v1 is defined

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27210 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|NOTABUG

[Bug ld/27210] ld: Don't suppress foo if foo@v1 is defined

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27210 --- Comment #2 from Fangrui Song --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > (In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #0) > > cat > a.s < > .globl foo > > .symver foo, foo@v1 > > foo: nop > > eof > > echo 'v1 {};' > a.ver > > cat > b.s < > .glob

[Bug ld/27210] ld: Don't suppress foo if foo@v1 is defined

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27210 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Status|UNCONFIRMED