--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-07-01 14:47
---
Hi Owen,
Thanks for the test case, and sorry for the long delay in getting back to this
bug. Using that test case and the second version of the patch I created I get a
working executable (which prints 0x000
--- Additional Comments From osk at exegin dot com 2009-05-06 20:10 ---
Created an attachment (id=3926)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3926&action=view)
IAR object producing error.
I've uploaded some sample code that can be used to reproduce the bug and to
test th
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-05-05 11:15
---
Hi Owen,
OK, I have uploaded a revised patch based Jay's suggestion. Please give it a
go and let me know if it works this time.
I am not comfortable with suppressing the overflow warnings for the other
reloc
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-05-05 11:12
---
Created an attachment (id=3924)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3924&action=view)
revised form of previous patch
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From JayS at spectralogic dot com 2009-05-04 22:05
---
Subject: R_ARM_THM_PC8 Relocation Not Implemented in elf32-arm.c
Some thoughts:
I'm now linking an IAR object file that used to produce the same type of
errors that Owen had. I made my own changes to the "
--- Additional Comments From JayS at spectralogic dot com 2009-05-04 03:50
---
Subject: RE: R_ARM_THM_PC8 Relocation Not Implemented in elf32-arm.c
Owen, Nick, et. al.,
I've been working towards the same objective and stumbled across your post.
I tried Nick's fix of 4/21 and had simi
--- Additional Comments From osk at exegin dot com 2009-04-30 18:42 ---
Hi Nick,
I tried out the patch, but it doesn't appear to work correctly. GNU ld still
outputs warnings when attempting to link the two libraries. We get the following
warnings:
libecc.a(tk-aes-e.obj): In function `t
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-04-21 17:13
---
Hi Owen,
I have uploaded a possible patch to fix this problem - please could you try it
out for me ?
Not having any binaries containing the R_ARM_THM_PC8 reloc makes testing
locally impossible, but I think th
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-04-21 17:12
---
Created an attachment (id=3898)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3898&action=view)
Add support for reloc #8
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10073
--- You are receiv
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||fff at exegin dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10073
--- You are receiving this mai
10 matches
Mail list logo
