https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26395
--- Comment #11 from Joel Sherrill ---
I can't say whether you are right or wrong on rejecting that assembly language
but it looks like this started as something generated by GCC like our case. If
gcc still generates that assembly statement, t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27217
--- Comment #10 from Joel Sherrill ---
Nick. Go back to the first comment when I posted this. I put the C code along
with assembly from two different optimization levels.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27217
--- Comment #3 from Joel Sherrill ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2)
> Created attachment 13329 [details]
> Proposed patch
>
> Hi Joel,
>
> Please could you try out this patch and let me know if it works for you ?
>
> Cheers
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26395
--- Comment #9 from Joel Sherrill ---
(In reply to Alex Coplan from comment #8)
> *** Bug 27217 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
It may be the same assert but I don't think it is the same trigger. The C code
in that ticket comp
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27217
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64-rtems aarch64-elf
--
You are
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: joel.sherrill at oarcorp dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The following C code compiles and assembles cleanly on the other 17
architectures supported by RTEMS
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26757
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|gdb |ld
Version|HEAD
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12242
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13991
--- Comment #14 from Joel Sherrill
2012-04-24 13:34:18 UTC ---
Thanks. The head now works again.
Can this patch be applied to the active release branches?
>From an earlier comment of mine:
works - binutils 2.21.1 with no patches
broken - b
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13991
--- Comment #9 from Joel Sherrill 2012-04-23
20:36:37 UTC ---
$ git bisect bad
8b6ed5b4da2a02a7cefa7db05e99cce952cbcd54 is the first bad commit
commit 8b6ed5b4da2a02a7cefa7db05e99cce952cbcd54
Author: Alan Modra
Date: Sat Jul 9 06:20:50 2011
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13991
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--
Configure
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13991
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hongjiu.lu at intel dot com
--
Config
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13991
--- Comment #6 from Joel Sherrill 2012-04-23
15:25:57 UTC ---
I managed to narrow down the time frame when this broke to between 2011-07-09
and 2011-07-11:
works - binutils 2.20.1 with rtems 4.10 patches
works - binutils 2.21.1 with no patche
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13991
--- Comment #5 from Joel Sherrill 2012-04-23
13:19:18 UTC ---
Following up on Sebastian's script to analyse the section of each global symbol
to see if there was a pattern. I don't see any pattern and I don't see any
difference between the sym
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13991
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill 2012-04-20
16:13:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I don't think this is a bug in binutils, but a bug in RTEMS.
>
> cf. http://www.rtems.org/pipermail/rtems-users/2012-April/009843.html
I respectfully t
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13991
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ralf.corsepius at rtems dot
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13991
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-rtems
--
Configure bugmail: h
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13991
Bug #: 13991
Summary: powerpc-rtems ld failure [regression]
Product: binutils
Version: 2.22
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
As
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12542
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-rtems
CC|
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12542
Summary: [regression] powerpc as failure
Product: binutils
Version: 2.22 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassig...@s
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12242
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill 2010-11-19
17:07:13 UTC ---
Test case with objects and scripts is at
http://www.rtems.org/ftp/pub/rtems/people/joel/bugs/binutils-pr12242.tar.bz2
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userpr
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12242
Summary: arm-rtems ld unexpected section overflow
Product: binutils
Version: 2.21
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassig...@so
22 matches
Mail list logo
