http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13991
--- Comment #6 from Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill at oarcorp dot com> 2012-04-23 15:25:57 UTC --- I managed to narrow down the time frame when this broke to between 2011-07-09 and 2011-07-11: works - binutils 2.20.1 with rtems 4.10 patches works - binutils 2.21.1 with no patches broken - binutils 2.22 with no patches works - 2.21.52.20110627 works - 2.21.52.20110701 works - 2.21.52.20110708 works - 2.21.52.20110709 broken - 2.21.52.20110710 broken - 2.21.52.20110714 The timestamps for the file changes are so close except for the gold changes that I can't separate them. Ignoring the gold changes, I see two entries in the bfd and ld ChangeLogs. This is the single ld ChangeLog entry: +2011-07-09 H.J. Lu <hongjiu...@intel.com> + + PR ld/12942 + * ldlang.c (section_already_linked): Pass "struct already_linked *" + to bfd_section_already_linked. + (lang_process): Set link_info.loading_lto_outputs before + loading LTO outputs. + * plugin.c: Include "libbfd.h". + (add_symbols): Call bfd_section_already_linked with comdat_key. + Since that mentions the phrase "already_linked" and our failure is on already linked code, this looks like the culprit. I don't see any indication that a test case like this one was tested for 12942. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
