[Bug ld/3307] bad relocation section name `'

2006-10-06 Thread jmbnyc at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-06 17:57 --- Subject: Re: bad relocation section name `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] bugs]$ gcc -v -c SPTest.s Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-redhat-linux Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/shar

[Bug ld/3307] bad relocation section name `'

2006-10-06 Thread jmbnyc at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-06 17:17 --- Subject: Re: bad relocation section name `' I just executed your command line and produced a file that is one byte different than what I sent. Not sure what is wrong with my environment as this is stock l

[Bug ld/3307] bad relocation section name `'

2006-10-06 Thread jmbnyc at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-06 16:38 --- Subject: Re: bad relocation section name `' Can you send me the command line that you used to create SPTest.o. /JMB On 6 Oct 2006 16:30:59 -, hjl at lucon dot org <[EMAIL PROTECTED

[Bug ld/3307] bad relocation section name `'

2006-10-06 Thread jmbnyc at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-06 13:42 --- Created an attachment (id=1353) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1353&action=view) updated tar gzip with requested SPTest.s Here is the requested SPTest.s. I also redid everything an

[Bug ld/3307] bad relocation section name `'

2006-10-06 Thread jmbnyc at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-06 13:21 --- Subject: Re: bad relocation section name `' I'll run again and upload what you ask for. However, I upgraded binutils so I can only give you something for 2.17 (but I get the same behavior with

[Bug ld/3307] bad relocation section name `'

2006-10-05 Thread jmbnyc at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-06 04:36 --- I ran eu-readelf on the SPTest.o file and noticed that some of the symbols are being truncated. This appears to be the problem that cause the linker to segv. That makes me think asm has some sort of memory

[Bug ld/3307] bad relocation section name `'

2006-10-05 Thread jmbnyc at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-05 13:39 --- Created an attachment (id=1347) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1347&action=view) gzip'd tar file with README that shows how to reproduce -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/

[Bug ld/3307] New: bad relocation section name `'

2006-10-05 Thread jmbnyc at gmail dot com
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: jmbnyc at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org,jmbnyc at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: GNU ld version 2.16.91.0.6 20060212 GCC host triplet: Redhat FC5: 2.6.17-1.2187_FC5 GCC target tr