https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29655
--- Comment #25 from Ilya Leoshkevich ---
Sorry for letting this fall through the cracks.
Last time I was concerned with kpatch implications; at least for the recent
(v6.10+) kernels they are obviated by having modules closer to vmlinux and
e
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30206
Ilya Leoshkevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Le
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30206
Ilya Leoshkevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arnez at linux dot ibm.com
--- Com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30206
Ilya Leoshkevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iii at linux dot ibm.com
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: iii at linux dot ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
I'm observing the following behavior for multiple architectures:
$ cat 1.s
xor %rax,%rax
.byte 0x9
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29655
--- Comment #23 from Ilya Leoshkevich ---
I'm currently regtesting the attached patch.
This discussion made me realize that our hotpatching support is currently
broken in a fashion similar to that of Qt5 (details in the patch's commit
message
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29655
Ilya Leoshkevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iii at linux dot ibm.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Comment #2 from Ilya Leoshkevich ---
Should be fixed by
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=973773de93a1af858e391ab413c47323b0869012.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
--- Comment #1 from Ilya Leoshkevich ---
I could reproduce this (with ASAN_OPTIONS=detect_leaks=0 make check-gas
RUNTESTFLAGS=--debug) and will try to fix it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29152
Ilya Leoshkevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at linux dot ibm.com
--
Y
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26918
--- Comment #3 from Ilya Leoshkevich ---
Created attachment 12977
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12977&action=edit
object file
I've attached the object file.
This is the minimized ld invocation that segfaults (tried
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26918
Ilya Leoshkevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at linux dot ibm.com
--
Y
P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: iii at linux dot ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
The following (arguably pointless) code crashes ld on s390x:
$ cat test.c
int add (int a, int b) { return a + b; }
$ cat test.lds
SECTIONS { /DISC
13 matches
Mail list logo
