[Bug binutils/16733] New: libiberty.a does not get installed by default?

2014-03-21 Thread harald.servat at bsc dot es
: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: harald.servat at bsc dot es Hello, IIRC, libiberty.a was installed by default on earlier versions of binutils, but in current version it is not installed (although it is compiled). Shall we enable this installation

[Bug binutils/15994] Different source code locations using the same addresses

2013-10-23 Thread harald.servat at bsc dot es
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15994 --- Comment #10 from Harald Servat --- Great! Now works like a charm! Thank you very much Nick! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailin

[Bug binutils/15994] Different source code locations using the same addresses

2013-10-22 Thread harald.servat at bsc dot es
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15994 --- Comment #8 from Harald Servat --- Hello Nick, my guess is the second is wrong, because the .cpp file is not meant to be in libtdl/.libs when built by the libtool. Is it possible to have a unique output for both? If not, I guess I can

[Bug binutils/15994] Different source code locations using the same addresses

2013-10-22 Thread harald.servat at bsc dot es
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15994 --- Comment #6 from Harald Servat --- Thank you Nick! It seems that the situation has improved, however there's a slightly issue with respect to the source file. If I repeat the process now (2.23.2+patch) adds libltdl/.libs in the second quer

[Bug binutils/15994] Different source code locations using the same addresses

2013-10-03 Thread harald.servat at bsc dot es
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15994 Harald Servat changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Bug binutils/15994] Different source code locations using the same addresses

2013-10-02 Thread harald.servat at bsc dot es
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15994 --- Comment #1 from Harald Servat --- The binary is too large for the bugzilla. You can grab a copy of the binary from: https://db.tt/yq9Njy7t -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug binutils/15994] New: Different source code locations using the same addresses

2013-10-02 Thread harald.servat at bsc dot es
Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: harald.servat at bsc dot es Hello, I have a binary (attached) that reports different source code locations for the same address. For instance, when querying to addresses 0x4f5cf5

[Bug binutils/15935] Inconsistent results in addr2line with repeated addresses

2013-09-05 Thread harald.servat at bsc dot es
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15935 --- Comment #2 from Harald Servat --- Created attachment 7190 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7190&action=edit This is the binary used, compressed using lzma. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug binutils/15935] New: Inconsistent results in addr2line with repeated addresses

2013-09-05 Thread harald.servat at bsc dot es
Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: harald.servat at bsc dot es Dear all, I've found that addr2line gives inconsistent results when using it. In particular, below I ask for addresses 0x40b746, 0x461883 and again 0x4