https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15994
Harald Servat <harald.servat at bsc dot es> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
--- Comment #3 from Harald Servat <harald.servat at bsc dot es> ---
Dear Nick, and others,
yes, there probably is some weird information in the debugging information,
and I'd like to inform the compiler devels, if possible. I tried to use readelf
-wl with the binary, and for the first query, I guess that the following info
is using
Line Number Statements:
Extended opcode 2: set Address to 0x4f5ca0
Advance Line by 36 to 37
Copy
Extended opcode 2: set Address to 0x4f5cd7
Special opcode 3: advance Address by 0 to 0x4f5cd7 and Line by 2 to 39
Extended opcode 2: set Address to 0x4f5cec
Advance Line by 4 to 43
Copy
But I can't get any pointer for the second query (0x4f5be8) it does not
translated. In fact, readelf -wl reports the first address as
Extended opcode 2: set Address to 0x4f5ca0
so is that a problem from the debugging information? Or should addr2line give
an error indicating that the address is not within the binary bounds? And
besides this, why this alters the third query, which seems to be correctly
translated earlier?
Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
