[Bug ld/18860] Order of ELF symbols is not preserved

2015-08-20 Thread dje at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18860 --- Comment #1 from dje at google dot com --- Of course, having written this, I can't find the place in gdb that uses this heuristic. Memory fail? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for th

[Bug ld/18860] New: Order of ELF symbols is not preserved

2015-08-20 Thread dje at google dot com
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: dje at google dot com Target Milestone: --- Demangling of ELF symbols is broken in gdb, and probably not fixable (in the general case). The problem is "What language does one demangle the symbol in?" There is no sta

[Bug binutils/18362] readelf needs to provide support for .debug_ranges with DWO files (fission)

2015-04-30 Thread dje at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18362 dje at google dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ccoutant at gmail dot com

[Bug binutils/18362] New: readelf needs to provide support for .debug_ranges with DWO files (fission)

2015-04-30 Thread dje at google dot com
Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: dje at google dot com Target Milestone: --- If I dump .debug_ranges of a binary built with fission, readelf ignores the entries in .debug_ranges that come from

[Bug binutils/18209] objdump -h is not very helpful printing decompressed section names

2015-04-21 Thread dje at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18209 --- Comment #7 from dje at google dot com --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #3) > Hi Doug, > > It is an artifact of the BFD library that objdump -h shows the > uncompressed versions of compressed debug sections. It cou

[Bug binutils/18218] bad handling of .debug_str_offsets section

2015-04-13 Thread dje at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18218 dje at google dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug binutils/18218] bad handling of .debug_str_offsets section

2015-04-08 Thread dje at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18218 dje at google dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #7 from dje

[Bug binutils/18218] bad handling of .debug_str_offsets section

2015-04-08 Thread dje at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18218 --- Comment #6 from dje at google dot com --- Created attachment 8233 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8233&action=edit testcase #2, .dwo file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug binutils/18218] bad handling of .debug_str_offsets section

2015-04-08 Thread dje at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18218 dje at google dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #8230|0 |1 is obsolete

[Bug binutils/18218] bad handling of .debug_str_offsets section

2015-04-08 Thread dje at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18218 --- Comment #4 from dje at google dot com --- Created attachment 8231 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8231&action=edit testcase #2, .c file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug binutils/18218] bad handling of .debug_str_offsets section

2015-04-08 Thread dje at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18218 --- Comment #3 from dje at google dot com --- Bleah. I needed to make .debug_str_offsets.dwo larger so that it actually would get compressed. gcc -m64 -gdwarf-4 -gsplit-dwarf -c readelf-str-offsets-bug.c -Wa,--compress-debug-sections --save

[Bug binutils/18218] bad handling of .debug_str_offsets section

2015-04-08 Thread dje at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18218 --- Comment #1 from dje at google dot com --- Created attachment 8230 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8230&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug binutils/18218] New: bad handling of .debug_str_offsets section

2015-04-08 Thread dje at google dot com
: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: dje at google dot com Problem: readelf -w readelf-str-offsets.dwo -> DW_AT_producer: (indexed string: 0x5): However, this works: readelf -wi readelf-str-offsets.dwo -> DW_AT_pr

[Bug binutils/18209] objdump -h is not very helpful printing decompressed section names

2015-04-07 Thread dje at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18209 --- Comment #1 from dje at google dot com --- I kinda wonder if the test should be reversed (in some sense, not blanketly). If I'm dumping section contents, how often would I prefer to dump the compressed form instead of the decompressed

[Bug binutils/18209] New: objdump -h is not very helpful printing decompressed section names

2015-04-07 Thread dje at google dot com
: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: dje at google dot com This is totally unintuitive. objdump -h foo.o shows the section .debug_gnu_pubnames, which I wanted to dump, so I did objdump -s -j

[Bug gold/15646] gold-generated .gdb_index has duplicated symbols that gdb-generated index doesn't

2013-11-12 Thread dje at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15646 --- Comment #1 from dje at google dot com --- Checked in this workaround in gdb: https://sourceware.org/ml/src-cvs/2013-q4/msg00119.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug

[Bug gold/15646] New: gold-generated .gdb_index has duplicated symbols that gdb-generated index doesn't

2013-06-18 Thread dje at google dot com
: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold Assignee: ian at airs dot com Reporter: dje at google dot com CC: ccoutant at google dot com The gdb-generated .gdb_index doesn't have duplicate entries in the symbol table for classes and

[Bug gold/15021] Gold generated index difference from gdb: symbols from TUs reference the containing CU

2013-06-11 Thread dje at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15021 --- Comment #2 from dje at google dot com --- The example is incomplete, -gpubnames is needed as well. Also, If gold doesn't see a usable pubnames/pubtypes section it will fall back to reading all the debug info, and thus it can gener

[Bug gold/15021] Gold generated index difference from gdb: symbols from TUs reference the containing CU

2013-01-16 Thread dje at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15021 dje at google dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||saugustine at google dot

[Bug gold/15021] New: Gold generated index difference from gdb: symbols from TUs reference the containing CU

2013-01-16 Thread dje at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15021 Bug #: 15021 Summary: Gold generated index difference from gdb: symbols from TUs reference the containing CU Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW

[Bug binutils/14663] strip --only-keep-debug doesn't remove .text, etc.

2012-10-26 Thread dje at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14663 --- Comment #7 from dje at google dot com 2012-10-26 22:37:54 UTC --- I think a few extra words, noting that the contents are gone, but the section headers remain, would go a long way. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla

[Bug binutils/14663] strip --only-keep-debug doesn't remove .text, etc.

2012-10-26 Thread dje at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14663 dje at google dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution

[Bug binutils/14663] strip --only-keep-debug doesn't remove .text, etc.

2012-10-26 Thread dje at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14663 --- Comment #3 from dje at google dot com 2012-10-26 15:55:37 UTC --- Testcase: gcc -g hello.c && strip --only-keep-debug a.out && (objdump -h a.out | grep text) -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userpre

[Bug binutils/14662] strip doesn't remove .gdb_index

2012-10-03 Thread dje at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14662 --- Comment #1 from dje at google dot com 2012-10-03 19:43:10 UTC --- Tentative patch submitted. http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-10/msg00025.html -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Bug binutils/14663] strip --only-keep-debug doesn't remove .text, etc.

2012-10-03 Thread dje at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14663 --- Comment #1 from dje at google dot com 2012-10-03 19:06:33 UTC --- Partial patch posted here: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-10/msg00019.html -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Bug binutils/14663] New: strip --only-keep-debug doesn't remove .text, etc.

2012-10-03 Thread dje at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14663 Bug #: 14663 Summary: strip --only-keep-debug doesn't remove .text, etc. Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug binutils/14662] New: strip doesn't remove .gdb_index

2012-10-03 Thread dje at google dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14662 Bug #: 14662 Summary: strip doesn't remove .gdb_index Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: b