https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27297
--- Comment #4 from Stephen Casner ---
Bug 27360 appears to be related, but I'm not sure if they can be called
duplicates.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27360
Stephen Casner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||casner at acm dot org
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27297
--- Comment #2 from Stephen Casner ---
git bisect finds this is the commit where the problem began:
commit 1038406a8f6609ad0a449746da70393b0835f699
Author: Nick Alcock
Date: Tue Jan 5 13:25:56 2021 +
libctf: rip out BFD_DEPENDENCI
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27297
Stephen Casner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #13183|tarball of possibly |tarball of possibly
descripti
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27297
--- Comment #1 from Stephen Casner ---
Created attachment 13183
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13183&action=edit
tarball of possibly relevant configs, MakefilesAdded tarball of these files.
Let me know if any others w
Priority: P2
Component: libctf
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: casner at acm dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 13182
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13182&action=edit
2.36 build log
I first encounter
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27297
Stephen Casner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||x86_64-apple-darwin18.7.0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26001
Stephen Casner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26001
Stephen Casner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |casner at acm dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26001
--- Comment #1 from Stephen Casner ---
Created attachment 12550
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12550&action=edit
Patch for the bug
This patch fixes the bug, but I need to add a test case and change logs.
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26001
Stephen Casner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||pdp11-aout
--
You are receiving thi
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: casner at acm dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Attempting to assemble the instruction
jsr pc,sprintf
results in error message "Too many operands". This occurs because "sp" is
inter
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829
--- Comment #5 from Stephen Casner ---
Created attachment 12486
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12486&action=edit
Additional patch for mingw and cygwin
The idiom of the tail wagging the dog comes to mind here. I was j
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829
--- Comment #2 from Stephen Casner ---
Does this patch also cause some of the other targets' testsuites to fail?
Scaling addresses down should not cause a problem, but if support for .dc.a is
not universal that could be a problem.
--
You ar
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25830
--- Comment #4 from Stephen Casner ---
Corrected patch request:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2020-April/110709.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18963
--- Comment #17 from Stephen Casner ---
Nick,
Thanks. I see that you still needed to bring in some of the changes to the
test script that you made in your previous commit. I assumed all the changes
you had to make to my first proposed fix w
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25828
--- Comment #3 from Stephen Casner ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2)
> Patch approved - please apply.
Was this an instruction to me to apply it myself? I have not established write
access, but would be happy to do so if that i
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25830
--- Comment #3 from Stephen Casner ---
Oops, sorry. I do understand the autotools process, but it has been a few
years and I was not paying enough attention so I overlooked it here. I will
proceed as you have suggested.
--
You are receivin
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18963
--- Comment #13 from Stephen Casner ---
Created attachment 12474
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12474&action=edit
Revised patch
Now I'm doubly sorry because I made this solution harder than necessary for
myself as wel
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18963
--- Comment #12 from Stephen Casner ---
Nick,
Had I known that my proposed change that fixes the test to pass for pdp11 would
cause the test to fail for several others, I would not have submitted it. A
much simpler and perhaps more fair chan
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25830
--- Comment #1 from Stephen Casner ---
Created attachment 12464
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12464&action=edit
Patch for configure
Add gdb and gprof to noconfigdirs for pdp11-*-*; gdbserver is handled
separately by
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: casner at acm dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Since the pdp11-aout target does not support gdb, gdbserver or gprof these
should be excluded in configure.
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829
--- Comment #1 from Stephen Casner ---
Created attachment 12463
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12463&action=edit
Patch to fix tests
After the patch for reopened PR 18963 and the patch for PR 25828 and this patch
are a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25828
--- Comment #1 from Stephen Casner ---
Created attachment 12462
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12462&action=edit
Patch to fix undefined symbols and sign extension
When bfd/pdp11.c was copied from bfd/aoutx.h, the #def
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: casner at acm dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Several tests in ld/testsuite/ld-scripts fail for the pdp11-aout target because
address and/or size constants used in the tests are
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: casner at acm dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Presumably since the creation of the pdp11-aout target 20 years ago, a symbol
defined in a linker script that is
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18963
--- Comment #9 from Stephen Casner ---
(In reply to Stephen Casner from comment #8)
...
> the output is the same as for the old script except for the different value
> for E and different section associations for some symbols.
To clarify, tho
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18963
--- Comment #8 from Stephen Casner ---
Created attachment 12461
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12461&action=edit
Patch for test to work with pdp11-aout
I found that my proposed pr18963.s got an assembly error with tar
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18963
Stephen Casner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||casner at acm dot org
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677
--- Comment #13 from Stephen Casner ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #12)
> You appear to be submitting the same patch as Jan... :-)
>
> The patch has the same problem as outlined here:
>
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binuti
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677
--- Comment #11 from Stephen Casner ---
Created attachment 12448
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12448&action=edit
Completed patch including tests and doc
Here is a patch against a current git pull that I believe inclu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677
--- Comment #9 from Stephen Casner ---
Another solution, perhaps the most straightforwad one, would be to change the
code in adjust_o_magic() to not pad the size of the data section if the size of
the bss section is zero.
--
You are receivin
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677
--- Comment #8 from Stephen Casner ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #5)
> The important issue is the extract symbols failure in the script.exp tests:
>
> Running ../../ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/script.exp ...
> [...]
> F
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677
--- Comment #6 from Stephen Casner ---
The key point I did not know is that failures were expected. I have been
studying the detail log and the test scripts (I have programmed in Tcl, but it
was about 30 years ago) to see why FAIL: extract sc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677
--- Comment #4 from Stephen Casner ---
Created attachment 12414
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12414&action=edit
ld make check summary log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677
--- Comment #3 from Stephen Casner ---
Created attachment 12412
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12412&action=edit
make check summary log
I should add that I did run "make check" without any other preparation with the
r
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677
--- Comment #2 from Stephen Casner ---
I could use some guidance regarding running the testsuite. After reading the
binutils porting document I have installed dejagnu, but I don't know what
information is needed in the global config, for exam
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: casner at acm dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: pdp11-aout
Created attachment 12378
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12378&action=edit
Proposed enhancemen
: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: casner at acm dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 12294
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12294&action=edit
Proposed patch
When the -s option is supplied to ld for pdp11-aout
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20694
--- Comment #7 from Stephen Casner ---
I have tested with a build from the git repository and concur that this bug is
fixed. Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20694
--- Comment #6 from Stephen Casner ---
Thanks for making this fix. I can’t do any testing immediately but will do so
in a couple of weeks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20694
--- Comment #3 from Stephen Casner ---
Do you need assistance with bringing up 2.11BSD and UNIX v7 systems on an
emulated PDP11? Those systems are included as examples prepared to run on the
PiDP11/70 recreated model front panel that Oscar Ve
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20694
--- Comment #2 from Stephen Casner ---
Thanks for picking up this bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20694
Stephen Casner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |2.27
--
You are receiving this mail
: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: casner at acm dot org
Target Milestone: ---
The file ld/emulparams/pdp11.sh includes the line:
TARGET_PAGE_SIZE=256
The actual page size of the memory management hardware on the PDP11/45,
PDP11/70, etc. is 8192 bytes
45 matches
Mail list logo
