[Bug ld/32871] ld/ldmain.c#L425 incorrect location of #endif

|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |2.45 Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- Fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32858] SEGV on ld function cache_bwrite

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32858 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com

[Bug ld/32858] SEGV on ld function cache_bwrite

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32858 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug binutils/32829] SEGV on objdump function debug_type_samep

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32829 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/32829] SEGV on objdump function debug_type_samep

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32829 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com

[Bug binutils/25237] Strip leaves file offset of empty PT_LOAD segment point past end of file

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25237 --- Comment #18 from Alan Modra --- BTW, there are multiple existing tests that exercise the hack added for this pr. One such is ld-elf/tbss1. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprof/13993] gprof failed to accumulate hist time

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13993 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprof/32768] New: tst-gmon failure on x86_64

Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: amodra at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- I'm seeing the new gprof test copied from glibc fail on x86_64-linux, depending on compiler and CFLAGS. I haven't fully investigated, but I think the problem is that glibc

[Bug gprof/32768] tst-gmon failure on x86_64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32768 --- Comment #9 from Alan Modra --- The fixed patch you posted to the mailing list works for me. The one attached here does not due to lack of -O2 when compiling tst-gmon.c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for t

[Bug gprof/32768] tst-gmon failure on x86_64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32768 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #8 from Alan Modra ---

[Bug gprof/32768] tst-gmon failure on x86_64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32768 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- $ gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -fcf-protection=none -fno-pie -pg -g -O1 -c -o tst-gmon.o /home/alan/src/binutils-virgin/gprof/testsuite/tst-gmon.c $ gcc -pg -g -O1 -o tst-gmon nop.o nop.o nop.o nop.o nop.o nop.o nop.o

[Bug gprof/32768] tst-gmon failure on x86_64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32768 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- Oh, sorry, the system compiler also needs -fno-pie -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprof/32768] tst-gmon failure on x86_64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32768 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- The compiler was one I built a while ago, (GCC) 15.0.0 20241022. I don't think it matters very much, you just need to compile to fairly small functions. My default system gcc Ubuntu 13.3.0-6ubuntu2~24.04 wi

[Bug gprof/32768] tst-gmon failure on x86_64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32768 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux-gnu CC|

[Bug ld/32731] ub sanitizer: load of value 190 into type '_Bool' in ldlang.c

|RESOLVED Target Milestone|--- |2.45 Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- Fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/32721] internal error in tc-i386.c:parse_register

sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- Fixed for 2.45 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/32721] New: internal error in tc-i386.c:parse_register

: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: amodra at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- This one is similar to pr30117 in that fuzzed nonsense can trigger the "know" in parse_register. Testcase: A=%eax%%! Y=A Z=A or $6,Z -- You are receiving

[Bug ld/32715] ld-elf/elf.exp fails, when configured with --disable-default-execstack --enable-warn-rwx-segments

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32715 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/32671] Default to erroring out on executable stacks

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32671 Bug 32671 depends on bug 32715, which changed state. Bug 32715 Summary: ld-elf/elf.exp fails, when configured with --disable-default-execstack --enable-warn-rwx-segments https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32715 What

[Bug binutils/32716] Memory leak issue in objdump

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32716 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/32716] Memory leak issue in objdump

|1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32715] ld-elf/elf.exp fails, when configured with --disable-default-execstack --enable-warn-rwx-segments

at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/32703] Null pointer dereference in bfd/linker.c

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32703 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.45 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug binutils/32703] Null pointer dereference in bfd/linker.c

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32703 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com

[Bug binutils/32699] Null pointer dereference in libiberty/cp-demangle.c

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32699 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gas/32700] [2.44 regression] score-unknown-elf gas SEGV

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32700 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/32698] Null pointer dereference in bfd/tekhex.c

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32698 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.45 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug binutils/32710] Null pointer dereference in libiberty/hashtab.c

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32710 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gas/32700] [2.44 regression] score-unknown-elf gas SEGV

||2025-02-15 Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- I typoed an array index. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/32698] Null pointer dereference in bfd/tekhex.c

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32698 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-02-15 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug binutils/32698] Null pointer dereference in bfd/tekhex.c

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32698 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com

[Bug ld/32690] ld internal error (internal error binutils/ld/ldlang.c 6618) with LTO

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32690 --- Comment #10 from Alan Modra --- I think HJ's patch is just papering over the real problem, and likely will result in sections being placed wrongly at the end of the relro segment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug binutils/32586] riscv objdump abort

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32586 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- riscv-dis.c:1444 sets dump_size from riscv_insn_length which looks like it can be up to 22 bytes. A carefully constructed testcase that gets this value from riscv_insn_length but then has only 20 bytes in th

[Bug ld/32664] ld buffer-overflow in _bfd_elf_strtab_offset (bfd/elf-strtab.c:292)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32664 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ld/32664] ld buffer-overflow in _bfd_elf_strtab_offset (bfd/elf-strtab.c:292)

|1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32663] ld heap-buffer-overflow in cache_bread_1 (bfd/cache.c:355:11)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32663 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/32662] ld Out-of-bounds Read in _bfd_generic_link_output_symbols (bfd/linker.c:2211:34)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32662 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ld/32663] ld heap-buffer-overflow in cache_bread_1 (bfd/cache.c:355:11)

sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed||2025-02-09 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32662] ld Out-of-bounds Read in _bfd_generic_link_output_symbols (bfd/linker.c:2211:34)

|1 Last reconfirmed||2025-02-09 Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32603] ld segv in bfd_set_format with -w -o XXX and no permissions for XXX

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32603 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.45 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ld/32603] ld segv in bfd_set_format with -w -o XXX and no permissions for XXX

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32603 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com

[Bug ld/32603] ld segv in bfd_set_format with -w -o XXX and no permissions for XXX

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32603 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- *** Bug 32645 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32603] ld segv in bfd_set_format with -w -o XXX and no permissions for XXX

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32603 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- -w breaks every single call to einfo that is supposed to exit due to the presence of %F. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32645] ld SEGV (illegal read access) in yylex (ld/ldlex.l:488:26) -w -T options

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32645 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ld/32603] ld segv in bfd_set_format with -w -o XXX and no permissions for XXX

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32603 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- *** Bug 32646 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32646] ld SEGV (illegal read access) in load_symbols (ld/ldlang.c:3061:7) with -w --defsym options

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32646 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug binutils/32542] Fatal error when remotely debugging MIPS32r2 binary with qemu

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32542 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC|amodra at gmail dot com| -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug binutils/32599] [2.44 Regression] objcopy -I ihex: invalid operation

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32599 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/32601] ld on Alpha terminated with double free or corruption (!prev) and signal 6

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32601 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- The backtrace isn't all that useful, but it is very likely to be one of the bfd_put_64 calls writing out a got entry. You'll need to find out which one. If I'm correct about it being a got entry, debug unde

[Bug binutils/32599] [2.44 Regression] objcopy -I ihex: invalid operation

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32599 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com

[Bug binutils/32586] riscv objdump abort

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32586 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target||riscv32-elf, |

[Bug binutils/32586] New: riscv objdump abort

Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: amodra at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- printf '\377\040\040\040\040' > xxx objdump -b binary -m riscv -D xxx xxx: file format binary Disassembly of section .data: <.data>: Aborted (core

[Bug ld/32580] [2.44 regression] Non-bash shell breaks many default linker scripts

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580 --- Comment #8 from Alan Modra --- Why are we using "$(func)" rather than just plain "func"? Maybe that tickles a ksh bug? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32491] [2.44 Regression] ld-elf/compress.exp test failures on arm-linux-gnueabi*

|--- |2.44 Status|NEW |RESOLVED Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #17 from Alan Modra --- Fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/32542] Fatal error when remotely debugging MIPS32r2 binary with qemu

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32542 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- If this is a bfd problem it ought to be reproducible with objdump, but from comment #2 I see the file being opened by solib_bfd_open is "/lib/ld-musl-mips-sf.so.1" and using current binutils I can objdump rom

[Bug binutils/32560] stack-buffer-overflow at objdump disassemble_bytes (objdump.c:3543:34)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32560 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.44 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug binutils/32560] stack-buffer-overflow at objdump disassemble_bytes (objdump.c:3543:34)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32560 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com

[Bug binutils/32555] nm displays D on functions

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32555 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- powerpc64 elfv1 is a little weird in that a function symbol is defined on its procedure descriptor rather than on the code for that function. "D" is correct in so far as the descriptor is in a data section.

[Bug ld/32238] Performance issues found from binutils version '2.36' version while usage of function 'lang_output_section_statement_lookup'

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32238 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ld/32238] Performance issues found from binutils version '2.36' version while usage of function 'lang_output_section_statement_lookup'

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32238 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Component|binutils|ld -- You are receiving this mail becau

[Bug binutils/32238] Performance issues found from binutils version '2.36' version while usage of function 'lang_output_section_statement_lookup'

|--- |2.44 CC|amodra at gmail dot com| Priority|P1 |P2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32266] ld.bfd segfaults when linking libclang_rt.asan-powerpc64.so on 32-bit PowerPC

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32266 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug binutils/31595] Abort in AArch64 disassembler's get_sreg_qualifier_from_value() function

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31595 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #7

[Bug binutils/31269] aarch64 objdump -D assertion failure

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31269 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug binutils/31379] alpha-dec-vms objdump use of uninitialized value

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31379 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug binutils/32238] Performance issues found from binutils version '2.36' version while usage of function 'lang_output_section_statement_lookup'

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32238 --- Comment #18 from Alan Modra --- Created attachment 15869 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15869&action=edit proposed fix would someone easily able to test performance of this patch, please try it out. -- You are r

[Bug binutils/32238] Performance issues found from binutils version '2.36' version while usage of function 'lang_output_section_statement_lookup'

||2025-01-04 Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com Ever confirmed|0 |1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/32484] [2.44 regression] pixman asm fails to assemble on arm (Error: bad instruction `ldr\t TMP1,[SRC,TMP1]')

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32484 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- Reverting pr32391 patches fix this one too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/32486] [2.44 regression] x264 fails to assemble on arm64 (Error: unknown mnemonic `endfunc' -- `endfunc')

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32486 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug gas/32391] \@ incorrectly handled in nested macros

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391 --- Comment #19 from Alan Modra --- Since I've put the PR number on fixes I've applied to Nick's patch, my fixes all appear here. That makes it fairly easy to revert. git revert 599739cc1c5d70ac958583130b4b5413aa101d8e 6d9b7667974372357fed1f

[Bug binutils/32507] Incorrect allocation size printed by 32-bit MinGW builds of BFD

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32507 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug binutils/32507] Incorrect allocation size printed by 32-bit MinGW builds of BFD

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32507 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #15863|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug binutils/32507] Incorrect allocation size printed by 32-bit MinGW builds of BFD

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32507 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com

[Bug ld/32491] [2.44 Regression] ld-elf/compress.exp test failures on arm-linux-gnueabi*

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32491 --- Comment #11 from Alan Modra --- Hmm, so to builld previously released versions of gcc with current binutils a user would need to apply a patch to gcc/configure.ac and regenerate gcc/configure, or modify config.h after configuring gcc. And

[Bug binutils/32399] buffer overflow printing core_file_failing_command

|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com Summary|A heap buffer overflow is |buffer overflow printing |found in display_bfd of

[Bug ld/32387] ppc64 TLS optimization bug when built with -fno-plt

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32387 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com

[Bug ld/32387] ppc64 TLS optimization bug when built with -fno-plt

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32387 --- Comment #6 from Alan Modra --- Created attachment 15806 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15806&action=edit proposed fix -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32387] ppc64 TLS optimization bug when built with -fno-plt

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32387 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ppc64 TLS local-dynamic |ppc64 TLS optimization bug

[Bug ld/32387] ppc64 TLS local-dynamic optimization bug when built with -fno-plt

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32387 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- Yes, as things stand the inline plt code emitted by gcc is incompatible with the linker telling glibc ld.so (via DT_PPC64_OPT & PPC64_OPT_TLS) to short-circuit tls_get_addr calls at runtime. I think I'd fix

[Bug binutils/32359] --dependency-file: wrong error message if `fopen()` fails

|--- |2.44 Resolution|--- |FIXED Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- Fixed, thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/32347] Buffer overflow in objdump

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32347 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug binutils/32347] Buffer overflow in objdump

|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com Ever confirmed|0 |1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/32333] nm recursive stack overflow (d_name, cp-demangle.c:1483)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32333 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug binutils/32332] nm recursive stack overflow (d_bare_function_type, cp-demangle.c:3113)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32332 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug binutils/32331] nm recursive stack overflow (d_print_comp, cp-demangle.c:6337)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32331 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug binutils/32319] An error caused by invalid string offset was found in GNU Binutilis 2.30, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or potentially has unspeci

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32319 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/31904] libdep.so plugin registers search path after default paths in bfd linker

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31904 Bug 31904 depends on bug 32300, which changed state. Bug 32300 Summary: --dependency-file: link dependencies are not all collected https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32300 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug ld/31904] libdep.so plugin registers search path after default paths in bfd linker

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31904 --- Comment #12 from Alan Modra --- I'm guessing the proposed patch was committed accidentally. Please see pr32300. Reverting the accidental patch also ficed x86_64-w64-mingw32 FAIL: libdep test: did not get expected output from the linker -

[Bug ld/32300] --dependency-file: link dependencies are not all collected

|RESOLVED Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- Fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/31904] libdep.so plugin registers search path after default paths in bfd linker

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31904 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||32300 Referenced Bugs: https://sourcew

[Bug ld/32300] --dependency-file: link dependencies are not all collected

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32300 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||31904 CC|

[Bug ld/32266] ld.bfd segfaults when linking libclang_rt.asan-powerpc64.so on 32-bit PowerPC

at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com Last reconfirmed||2024-10-13 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- Created attachment 15744 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15744&action=ed

[Bug ld/32266] ld.bfd segfaults when linking libclang_rt.asan-powerpc64.so on 32-bit PowerPC

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32266 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- --disable-mmap will fix this -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32260] regression: /bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.43.1 assertion fail ../../bfd/merge.c:247

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32260 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- Yes, I see now that the error from sec_merge_maybe_resize is passed up to record_section and _bfd_merge_sections, but elflink.c:_bfd_elf_merge_sections ignores an error from _bfd_merge_sections. ldlang.c:lan

[Bug ld/32260] regression: /bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.43.1 assertion fail ../../bfd/merge.c:247

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32260 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- Looks to me that merge.c:177 should be unsigned int newnb ... By calculating newnb as unsigned long we get to a count of 2^32 and overflow table->nbuckets without triggering an error in sec_merge_maybe_resize

[Bug admin/32252] ./configure produces invalid Makefile

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32252 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- Hmm, OK, so the lack of Makefile substitutions is due to your config.status line 732: cat >>"/subs1.awk" <<\_ACAWK && Note that a later line has: cat >>"$ac_tmp/subs1.awk" <<\_ACAWK && $ac_tmp/subs1.awk is t

[Bug admin/32252] ./configure produces invalid Makefile

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32252 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/32243] NAME_MAX does not exist on mingw-w64 without the define of _POSIX_ macro

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32243 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- Yes, 255 is the value I used in the patch that was applied. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/32243] NAME_MAX does not exist on mingw-w64 without the define of _POSIX_ macro

|RESOLVED Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- Fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/32244] strip should deal with all architectures

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32244 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >