[Bug ld/33020] Segmentation Fault in _bfd_elf_strtab_offset During Object Content Writing

2025-05-30 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33020 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ld/33020] Segmentation Fault in _bfd_elf_strtab_offset During Object Content Writing

2025-05-30 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
redhat dot com|amodra at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/33020] Segmentation Fault in _bfd_elf_strtab_offset During Object Content Writing

2025-05-30 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33020 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug binutils/33025] Unknown Crash in elfedit's byte_get_little_endian Due to Wild Pointer Dereference

2025-05-28 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
|--- |2.45 Resolution|--- |FIXED Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- Fixed for 2.45 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/33024] Segmentation Fault in elfedit's byte_get_little_endian Function

2025-05-28 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |2.45 Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- Fixed for 2.45 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/33029] Internal error (segfault) in dwarf2_finish with --gdwarf-5

2025-05-28 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33029 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com

[Bug ld/33018] Segmentation Fault in ld-new due to Unsupported Relocation Type

2025-05-27 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33018 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/33018] Segmentation Fault in ld-new due to Unsupported Relocation Type

2025-05-27 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33018 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com -- You

[Bug binutils/33023] Memory Leak in objdump During Section and Symbol Table Processing

2025-05-27 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
|RESOLVED Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com Target Milestone|--- |2.45 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- Fixed for 2.45 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/33021] Heap Buffer Overflow in ld-new's fwrite During EH Frame Header Writing

2025-05-27 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
|--- |2.45 Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- Fixed for 2.45 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/33027] Stack Overflow in c++filt's demangle_path and demangle_type Functions

2025-05-27 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33027 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/33022] Heap Buffer Overflow in nm with liblto_plugin.so During strncmp

2025-05-27 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33022 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |MOVED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug binutils/33026] Stack Overflow in c++filt's demangle_path Function

2025-05-27 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33026 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/33028] Stack Overflow in c++filt's demangle_path and eat Functions

2025-05-27 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33028 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/3298] -mrelax broken for sh-elf

2025-05-24 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3298 --- Comment #16 from Alan Modra --- (In reply to Joern Rennecke from comment #11) > I see we have similar code in coff-sh.c sh_swap_insns. Yes. That is obviously wrong too. Likely adjusting r_addend isn't the right thing to do for COFF, we'd

[Bug ld/32978] ld should error out on insane section header size

2025-05-17 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32978 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |MOVED Status|NEW

[Bug binutils/32944] objdump (2.34) segfaults with option list "-x -d -r -t -p -S --dwarf=info,rawline,decodedline,frames,frames-interp,follow-links,Ranges,gdb_index,abbrev"

2025-05-06 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32944 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |OBSOLETE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ld/32896] GNU ld does not enforce PT_TLS segment p_offset/p_vaddr congruity with p_align

2025-05-01 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32896 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.45 Resolution|---

[Bug ld/32896] GNU ld does not enforce PT_TLS segment p_offset/p_vaddr congruity with p_align

2025-04-27 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32896 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- HJ's patch looks good except that the new test fails for me.. Also the comment needs tweaking. I'd suggest something like: /* Set sh_offset for .tbss sections to their nominal

[Bug ld/32871] ld/ldmain.c#L425 incorrect location of #endif

2025-04-14 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |2.45 Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- Fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32858] SEGV on ld function cache_bwrite

2025-04-10 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32858 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com

[Bug ld/32858] SEGV on ld function cache_bwrite

2025-04-10 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32858 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug binutils/32829] SEGV on objdump function debug_type_samep

2025-04-01 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32829 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/32829] SEGV on objdump function debug_type_samep

2025-03-31 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32829 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com

[Bug binutils/25237] Strip leaves file offset of empty PT_LOAD segment point past end of file

2025-03-09 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25237 --- Comment #18 from Alan Modra --- BTW, there are multiple existing tests that exercise the hack added for this pr. One such is ld-elf/tbss1. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprof/13993] gprof failed to accumulate hist time

2025-03-08 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13993 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprof/32768] New: tst-gmon failure on x86_64

2025-03-08 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: amodra at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- I'm seeing the new gprof test copied from glibc fail on x86_64-linux, depending on compiler and CFLAGS. I haven't fully investigated, but I think the problem is that glibc

[Bug gprof/32768] tst-gmon failure on x86_64

2025-03-08 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32768 --- Comment #9 from Alan Modra --- The fixed patch you posted to the mailing list works for me. The one attached here does not due to lack of -O2 when compiling tst-gmon.c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for t

[Bug gprof/32768] tst-gmon failure on x86_64

2025-03-08 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32768 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #8 from Alan Modra ---

[Bug gprof/32768] tst-gmon failure on x86_64

2025-03-08 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32768 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- $ gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -fcf-protection=none -fno-pie -pg -g -O1 -c -o tst-gmon.o /home/alan/src/binutils-virgin/gprof/testsuite/tst-gmon.c $ gcc -pg -g -O1 -o tst-gmon nop.o nop.o nop.o nop.o nop.o nop.o nop.o

[Bug gprof/32768] tst-gmon failure on x86_64

2025-03-08 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32768 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- Oh, sorry, the system compiler also needs -fno-pie -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprof/32768] tst-gmon failure on x86_64

2025-03-08 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32768 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- The compiler was one I built a while ago, (GCC) 15.0.0 20241022. I don't think it matters very much, you just need to compile to fairly small functions. My default system gcc Ubuntu 13.3.0-6ubuntu2~24.04 wi

[Bug gprof/32768] tst-gmon failure on x86_64

2025-03-07 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32768 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux-gnu CC|

[Bug ld/32731] ub sanitizer: load of value 190 into type '_Bool' in ldlang.c

2025-02-23 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
|RESOLVED Target Milestone|--- |2.45 Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- Fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/32721] internal error in tc-i386.c:parse_register

2025-02-19 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- Fixed for 2.45 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/32721] New: internal error in tc-i386.c:parse_register

2025-02-19 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: amodra at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- This one is similar to pr30117 in that fuzzed nonsense can trigger the "know" in parse_register. Testcase: A=%eax%%! Y=A Z=A or $6,Z -- You are receiving

[Bug ld/32715] ld-elf/elf.exp fails, when configured with --disable-default-execstack --enable-warn-rwx-segments

2025-02-18 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32715 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/32671] Default to erroring out on executable stacks

2025-02-18 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32671 Bug 32671 depends on bug 32715, which changed state. Bug 32715 Summary: ld-elf/elf.exp fails, when configured with --disable-default-execstack --enable-warn-rwx-segments https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32715 What

[Bug binutils/32716] Memory leak issue in objdump

2025-02-18 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32716 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/32716] Memory leak issue in objdump

2025-02-18 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
|1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32715] ld-elf/elf.exp fails, when configured with --disable-default-execstack --enable-warn-rwx-segments

2025-02-18 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/32703] Null pointer dereference in bfd/linker.c

2025-02-18 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32703 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.45 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug binutils/32703] Null pointer dereference in bfd/linker.c

2025-02-18 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32703 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com

[Bug binutils/32699] Null pointer dereference in libiberty/cp-demangle.c

2025-02-18 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32699 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gas/32700] [2.44 regression] score-unknown-elf gas SEGV

2025-02-17 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32700 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/32698] Null pointer dereference in bfd/tekhex.c

2025-02-17 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32698 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.45 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug binutils/32710] Null pointer dereference in libiberty/hashtab.c

2025-02-17 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32710 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gas/32700] [2.44 regression] score-unknown-elf gas SEGV

2025-02-15 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
||2025-02-15 Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- I typoed an array index. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/32698] Null pointer dereference in bfd/tekhex.c

2025-02-14 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32698 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-02-15 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug binutils/32698] Null pointer dereference in bfd/tekhex.c

2025-02-14 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32698 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com

[Bug ld/32690] ld internal error (internal error binutils/ld/ldlang.c 6618) with LTO

2025-02-14 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32690 --- Comment #10 from Alan Modra --- I think HJ's patch is just papering over the real problem, and likely will result in sections being placed wrongly at the end of the relro segment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug binutils/32586] riscv objdump abort

2025-02-11 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32586 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- riscv-dis.c:1444 sets dump_size from riscv_insn_length which looks like it can be up to 22 bytes. A carefully constructed testcase that gets this value from riscv_insn_length but then has only 20 bytes in th

[Bug ld/32664] ld buffer-overflow in _bfd_elf_strtab_offset (bfd/elf-strtab.c:292)

2025-02-09 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32664 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ld/32664] ld buffer-overflow in _bfd_elf_strtab_offset (bfd/elf-strtab.c:292)

2025-02-09 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
|1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32663] ld heap-buffer-overflow in cache_bread_1 (bfd/cache.c:355:11)

2025-02-09 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32663 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/32662] ld Out-of-bounds Read in _bfd_generic_link_output_symbols (bfd/linker.c:2211:34)

2025-02-09 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32662 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ld/32663] ld heap-buffer-overflow in cache_bread_1 (bfd/cache.c:355:11)

2025-02-09 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed||2025-02-09 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32662] ld Out-of-bounds Read in _bfd_generic_link_output_symbols (bfd/linker.c:2211:34)

2025-02-09 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
|1 Last reconfirmed||2025-02-09 Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32603] ld segv in bfd_set_format with -w -o XXX and no permissions for XXX

2025-02-06 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32603 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.45 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ld/32603] ld segv in bfd_set_format with -w -o XXX and no permissions for XXX

2025-02-06 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32603 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com

[Bug ld/32603] ld segv in bfd_set_format with -w -o XXX and no permissions for XXX

2025-02-05 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32603 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- *** Bug 32645 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32603] ld segv in bfd_set_format with -w -o XXX and no permissions for XXX

2025-02-05 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32603 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- -w breaks every single call to einfo that is supposed to exit due to the presence of %F. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32645] ld SEGV (illegal read access) in yylex (ld/ldlex.l:488:26) -w -T options

2025-02-05 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32645 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ld/32603] ld segv in bfd_set_format with -w -o XXX and no permissions for XXX

2025-02-05 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32603 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- *** Bug 32646 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32646] ld SEGV (illegal read access) in load_symbols (ld/ldlang.c:3061:7) with -w --defsym options

2025-02-05 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32646 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug binutils/32542] Fatal error when remotely debugging MIPS32r2 binary with qemu

2025-01-27 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32542 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC|amodra at gmail dot com| -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug binutils/32599] [2.44 Regression] objcopy -I ihex: invalid operation

2025-01-27 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32599 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/32601] ld on Alpha terminated with double free or corruption (!prev) and signal 6

2025-01-27 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32601 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- The backtrace isn't all that useful, but it is very likely to be one of the bfd_put_64 calls writing out a got entry. You'll need to find out which one. If I'm correct about it being a got entry, debug unde

[Bug binutils/32599] [2.44 Regression] objcopy -I ihex: invalid operation

2025-01-25 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32599 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com

[Bug binutils/32586] riscv objdump abort

2025-01-23 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32586 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target||riscv32-elf, |

[Bug binutils/32586] New: riscv objdump abort

2025-01-23 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: amodra at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- printf '\377\040\040\040\040' > xxx objdump -b binary -m riscv -D xxx xxx: file format binary Disassembly of section .data: <.data>: Aborted (core

[Bug ld/32580] [2.44 regression] Non-bash shell breaks many default linker scripts

2025-01-22 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580 --- Comment #8 from Alan Modra --- Why are we using "$(func)" rather than just plain "func"? Maybe that tickles a ksh bug? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32491] [2.44 Regression] ld-elf/compress.exp test failures on arm-linux-gnueabi*

2025-01-21 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
|--- |2.44 Status|NEW |RESOLVED Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #17 from Alan Modra --- Fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/32542] Fatal error when remotely debugging MIPS32r2 binary with qemu

2025-01-17 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32542 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- If this is a bfd problem it ought to be reproducible with objdump, but from comment #2 I see the file being opened by solib_bfd_open is "/lib/ld-musl-mips-sf.so.1" and using current binutils I can objdump rom

[Bug binutils/32560] stack-buffer-overflow at objdump disassemble_bytes (objdump.c:3543:34)

2025-01-15 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32560 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.44 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug binutils/32560] stack-buffer-overflow at objdump disassemble_bytes (objdump.c:3543:34)

2025-01-15 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32560 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com

[Bug binutils/32555] nm displays D on functions

2025-01-13 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32555 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- powerpc64 elfv1 is a little weird in that a function symbol is defined on its procedure descriptor rather than on the code for that function. "D" is correct in so far as the descriptor is in a data section.

[Bug ld/32238] Performance issues found from binutils version '2.36' version while usage of function 'lang_output_section_statement_lookup'

2025-01-09 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32238 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ld/32238] Performance issues found from binutils version '2.36' version while usage of function 'lang_output_section_statement_lookup'

2025-01-07 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32238 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Component|binutils|ld -- You are receiving this mail becau

[Bug binutils/32238] Performance issues found from binutils version '2.36' version while usage of function 'lang_output_section_statement_lookup'

2025-01-07 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
|--- |2.44 CC|amodra at gmail dot com| Priority|P1 |P2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32266] ld.bfd segfaults when linking libclang_rt.asan-powerpc64.so on 32-bit PowerPC

2025-01-04 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32266 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug binutils/31595] Abort in AArch64 disassembler's get_sreg_qualifier_from_value() function

2025-01-04 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31595 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #7

[Bug binutils/31269] aarch64 objdump -D assertion failure

2025-01-04 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31269 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug binutils/31379] alpha-dec-vms objdump use of uninitialized value

2025-01-04 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31379 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug binutils/32238] Performance issues found from binutils version '2.36' version while usage of function 'lang_output_section_statement_lookup'

2025-01-03 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32238 --- Comment #18 from Alan Modra --- Created attachment 15869 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15869&action=edit proposed fix would someone easily able to test performance of this patch, please try it out. -- You are r

[Bug binutils/32238] Performance issues found from binutils version '2.36' version while usage of function 'lang_output_section_statement_lookup'

2025-01-03 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
||2025-01-04 Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com Ever confirmed|0 |1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/32484] [2.44 regression] pixman asm fails to assemble on arm (Error: bad instruction `ldr\t TMP1,[SRC,TMP1]')

2025-01-01 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32484 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- Reverting pr32391 patches fix this one too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/32486] [2.44 regression] x264 fails to assemble on arm64 (Error: unknown mnemonic `endfunc' -- `endfunc')

2025-01-01 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32486 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug gas/32391] \@ incorrectly handled in nested macros

2025-01-01 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391 --- Comment #19 from Alan Modra --- Since I've put the PR number on fixes I've applied to Nick's patch, my fixes all appear here. That makes it fairly easy to revert. git revert 599739cc1c5d70ac958583130b4b5413aa101d8e 6d9b7667974372357fed1f

[Bug binutils/32507] Incorrect allocation size printed by 32-bit MinGW builds of BFD

2025-01-01 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32507 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug binutils/32507] Incorrect allocation size printed by 32-bit MinGW builds of BFD

2024-12-30 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32507 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #15863|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug binutils/32507] Incorrect allocation size printed by 32-bit MinGW builds of BFD

2024-12-30 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32507 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com

[Bug ld/32491] [2.44 Regression] ld-elf/compress.exp test failures on arm-linux-gnueabi*

2024-12-28 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32491 --- Comment #11 from Alan Modra --- Hmm, so to builld previously released versions of gcc with current binutils a user would need to apply a patch to gcc/configure.ac and regenerate gcc/configure, or modify config.h after configuring gcc. And

[Bug binutils/32399] buffer overflow printing core_file_failing_command

2024-11-28 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com Summary|A heap buffer overflow is |buffer overflow printing |found in display_bfd of

[Bug ld/32387] ppc64 TLS optimization bug when built with -fno-plt

2024-11-26 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32387 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com

[Bug ld/32387] ppc64 TLS optimization bug when built with -fno-plt

2024-11-25 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32387 --- Comment #6 from Alan Modra --- Created attachment 15806 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15806&action=edit proposed fix -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32387] ppc64 TLS optimization bug when built with -fno-plt

2024-11-25 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32387 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ppc64 TLS local-dynamic |ppc64 TLS optimization bug

[Bug ld/32387] ppc64 TLS local-dynamic optimization bug when built with -fno-plt

2024-11-25 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32387 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- Yes, as things stand the inline plt code emitted by gcc is incompatible with the linker telling glibc ld.so (via DT_PPC64_OPT & PPC64_OPT_TLS) to short-circuit tls_get_addr calls at runtime. I think I'd fix

[Bug binutils/32359] --dependency-file: wrong error message if `fopen()` fails

2024-11-15 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
|--- |2.44 Resolution|--- |FIXED Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- Fixed, thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/32347] Buffer overflow in objdump

2024-11-13 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32347 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >