https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3298
--- Comment #16 from Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Joern Rennecke from comment #11) > I see we have similar code in coff-sh.c sh_swap_insns. Yes. That is obviously wrong too. Likely adjusting r_addend isn't the right thing to do for COFF, we'd probably need to adjust section contents instead. If we had an assembly language testcase with R_SH_USES involved in an insn swap for sh-elf then even I could look into the coff-sh case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
