RE: Suspected bug in binutils / ld (using ver 2.22).

2012-05-21 Thread Simon B
;-). - Simon. > Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 22:35:13 +0930 > From: amo...@gmail.com > To: sbur...@hotmail.com > Subject: Re: Suspected bug in binutils / ld (using ver 2.22). > > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:59:28PM +0100, Simon B wrote: > > > > Alan, > > Actually I

RE: Suspected bug in binutils / ld (using ver 2.22).

2012-05-21 Thread Simon B
tils@gnu.org > Subject: Re: Suspected bug in binutils / ld (using ver 2.22). > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 09:29:16PM +0100, Simon B wrote: > > 1. I compiled binutils with sysroot support but without specifying a > > sysroot, so ./configure --sysroot=. > > Did you configure usin

Suspected bug in binutils / ld (using ver 2.22).

2012-05-17 Thread Simon B
Hiyas, I think I've discovered a bug in BinUtils 2.22. It's a bit of a nasty one to specify exactly -- I'm not sure how much of the following criteria is necessary to reproduce it. 1. I compiled binutils with sysroot support but without specifying a sysroot, so ./configure --sysroot=. This is b