https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
--- Comment #9 from Sam James ---
It works OK if modpost is built with -O0 or -O1.
With -O2:
```
Starting program: /root/git/linux/scripts/mod/modpost -M -o Module.symvers -n
-T modules.order vmlinux.o
[Thread debugging using libthread_db ena
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #7)
> Naively building linux-6.12.4 with sparc64_defconfig and `make ...
> LD=/path/to/trunk/ld` builds OK with no modpost issues.
.. helps if you do AS too, duh. Reproduce
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
Naively building linux-6.12.4 with sparc64_defconfig and `make ...
LD=/path/to/trunk/ld` builds OK with no modpost issues.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32493
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #5)
>
> I spent some time until I figured out the problem was in binutils but then
> ran out of time which is why I filed the bug report first.
(That's of
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
--- Comment #6 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #0)
> seen on the trunk, not with 2.43.1 on arm-linux-gnueabihf. The linux build
> fails with a bus error during the modpost call. The machine that it i
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32493
--- Comment #5 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #1)
> Please provide at least a .config which can reproduce it, as well as a good
> and bad modpost binary (with only binutils version differing between them
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
I'll try reproduce it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glaubitz at physik dot
fu-berlin.d
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32493
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13438
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32493
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
Dup of PR 32435?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32493
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
I can try get those elements tonight but I can't promise as I've got other bits
on TODO for this evening.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32493
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Please provide at least a .config which can reproduce it, as well as a good and
bad modpost binary (with only binutils version differing between them).
Preprocessed source for modpost would be great as well.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32493
Bug ID: 32493
Summary: Binutils 2.44 results in unaligned code on
linux-sparc64
Product: binutils
Version: 2.44 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30033
Rui Ueyama changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rui314 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 f
15 matches
Mail list logo
